too important to not show

I have to give into the idea as a fact that there ARE times when surgical procedures need to be implemented but if they do further harm- WHY NOT use non-surgical skin expansion methods to permanently enlarge the 4skin's open diameter by proven skin expansion techniques?

I was cut at birth WAY TOO SHORT come to find out at 53yo and after I started to restore my 4skin, a whole 1.5"+ of shaft gradually showed up in my erection the more skin I grew, and sex was no longer painful down and behind my scrotum! I like non-surgical methods first- they do work IF you have the will to do them daily and consistently. IF they do not for other reasons like you don't have the time, you are forgetful, you like surgeries (yes there are those out there! LOL!), then cut away I suppose.

pages.suddenlink.net/manual...

Statistics are tricky.

IF a cutting is done RIGHT-it should not affect a male's length, it is when it is not performed correctly is when is restricts the shaft to hang or the erection to fully move outward that cutting effects length. I have seen, was a victim myself where newborn cutting is not that smart. Doctors that cut have no idea how long a male's penis will be, flaccid or erect at the time of birth compared to the adult/mature final size. It is too easy to remove too much at the Birth cutting. And it is not really being watched to see just how common or uncommon this is but after years in the Army and Males talk- it might be more common than any of us suspect/know. One thing I know about the world of medicine since being a Hospital Admin, in the USA, they do not count what they do not want you to know. Basically too many times a death is coded and acknowledged by the injuries from cutting, Circumcism is not mentioned at all, pretty much covers the tracks.

cirp.org/library/death/

circumstitions.com/death.html

aapc.com/discuss/threads/po...

wisewomanwayofbirth.com/62/ "in Judaism if two of your sons have died from circumcision, you do not have to circumcise your third son."

clearly shows that if this child passed from the bleeding caused by a messy circumcism, the coding would have been the bleed out as cause of death, not the circumcism- the circumcism days before did not kill him- convenient popcorn logic,..., saw this firsthand in coding in the 90s. I was floored to even find this online actually, but who would think to know where to look if they were not made open to medical coding?

We have choices, but do we if they are not made known to us?

-S