A new Canadian paper {1]. A soapbox paper, but one that resonates with me
Many years ago now, I ended up in ER with a double DVT (deep vein thrombosis) in my left leg ; fortunately below the knee. My doctor wanted me on 3 months warfarin (as a first time offender) + 3 months extra for cancer. I asked him why, if he knew I was at risk because of PCa, did he never test for blood clots?
The crazy answer was that there was no safe medication to prevent clots, so doctors never test for them. But if a patient gets a clot & doesn't die on the way to the ER, the "unsafe" meds become acceptable.
I did 3 months of warfarin & had another ultrasound. One DVT had cleared; the other hadn't. My doctor knew I wanted to get off warfarin. Without vitamin K, bones weaken & arteries accumulate calcium. He said the the second DVT might never clear. He agreed to me trying natokinase & monitoring with D-dimer. I have had no problems since.
I urge everyone to get a D-dimer test. There are three scenarios: zero, normal range & elevated. With elevated, there is probably a clot, although D-dimer might be elevated for other reasons - but cancer makes that less likely. With "normal", who knows? I shoot for zero, or as close to zero that the lab can go.
I use nattokinase before bed. The standard cap is 2,000 FUs and I need 8 caps. This keeps me as low as the lab can measure.
The body disolves clots with the enzyme plasmin. Necessarily, this is a slow process, since the clot might be essential. Nattokinase has a similar structure to plasmin but works faster. You wouldn't use it if you had just had a major accident, but otherwise, an elevated D-dimer suggests unwanted coagulation.
Having experienced the indignity of frequent trips to the "Coumadin (warfarin) Clinic", I have zero tolerance for "normal" D-dimer.
It has been said that circulating cancer cells (which are efficiently zapped by the immune system), must dock on a micro-clot to survive. IMO, nattokinate can prevent new bone mets. Even in men with multiple mets, there is value in preventing new mets. I have had mets at L5, T6 & S1, but have avoided being riddled with lesions, so far.
From the paper:
"Thrombosis is one of the leading causes of death in cancer.
"Cancer-induced hypercoagulable state contributes to thrombosis and is often overlooked.
"Prostate cancer may not be of high thrombogenic potential compared with other cancers, but its high prevalence brings it into focus.
"Pathological evidence for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in prostate cancer exists. Factors such as age, comorbidities, and therapies increase the VTE risk further. There is a need to systematically identify the risk of VTE in regard to patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors to risk stratify patients for better-targeted and individualized strategies to prevent VTE.
"Sensitive tests to enable such risk assessment are urgently required. There is sufficient evidence for the utility of thromboelastography (TEG) in cancer, but it is not yet part of the clinic and there is only limited data on the use of TEG in prostate cancer."
& so on.
Get that D-dimer test.
-Patrick
[1] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/364...