So - I love gadgets so I usually head out with the phone/GPS (Laura by my side and in my ear of course) and a heart rate monitor strapped to my chest. Lately though I've found I'm developing an aversion to the HRM as I now spend time analysing my heart rate post run.
The problem is that now on the longer runs I'm finding I'm spending more time in "High Intensity" and "Race Pace" than in "Endurance" zones... Given that those "Max HR" calculations are quite clearly not a one size fits all solution and given I'm not running a marathon at a level of 182 BPM (I'm 41) I know this isn't a really good indication for me to slow down. I never feel like I'm about to pass out or collapse while I'm out and although I'm keeping myself "warm and sweaty" and pushing myself a bit it's never caused me any problem... I also did a proper stress test a few years back in hospital (can't remember the max rate though) and cardiology wise I'm "good to go"...
Which is where the "hate" bit about the HRM comes in. I shouldn't worry about it, but of course you tend to when you can look back at all the stats...
So - I've decided to focus now soley on how quickly I recover and I have found that my HR drops by 20-30BPMs in about 2-3 minutes after I've finished my run. That to me is the "good bit"...
Anyone else find themselves going crazy over statistics like me?