More CAR-T: Looking Back to Go Forward in CAR... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,512 members38,664 posts

More CAR-T: Looking Back to Go Forward in CAR-T Cell Therapy in R/R CLL

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
7 Replies

Long-term data from a phase 1 study investigating anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with R/R CLL showed that the product appeared to be safe, and that prior lymphodepleting chemotherapy is necessary.

The data, published in JCI Insight, also brought to the forefront ibrutinib as a possible means of enhancing CAR-T’s efficacy in CLL.

Approximately a quarter of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL achieve durable responses to anti-CD19 CAR-T.

Overall, 6 of the 16 CLL patients (38%) achieved an objective response, but among patients who received lymphodepleting chemotherapy, the response rate was 50% (6 of 12 patients). The response rate increased to 80% (4 of 5 patients) when only patients who received concurrent ibrutinib in addition to lymphodepleting chemotherapy were considered.

More here: cancertherapyadvisor.com/ho...

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
7 Replies
DriedSeaweed profile image
DriedSeaweed

Does Car-T cause neutropenia like most other treatments?

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to DriedSeaweed

Yes :(

my.clevelandclinic.org/heal...

DriedSeaweed profile image
DriedSeaweed in reply to Jm954

I wonder if it is because they pretreat with other drugs before the car-t process.

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to DriedSeaweed

That could definitely be a contributing factor.

Jackie

Bell53 profile image
Bell53

I am assuming the population pre-treated with ibrutinib were continuing to have effective disease control with ibrutinib before starting Car- t

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to Bell53

Yes and they were having concurrent Ibrutinib.

Smakwater profile image
Smakwater

Good read Jackie,

My take away,

1). “It’s very small numbers of patients, and we would not want to attempt to draw definitive conclusions, but it’s consistent with other lines of evidence to suggest that ibrutinib may modulate T-cell phenotypes and function,”

2). “It certainly makes sense to test [adding ibrutinib] because if you can make the responses better, that certainly should be a goal, because toxicities are seemingly not so severe,”

Reasonably Anxious to see the CAR T end point. Appears to have great potential.

JM

You may also like...

An Early Look at When CAR-T Therapy Fails Patients With CLL

and characteristics of patients with CLL who received anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy during a clinical...

The current status and challenges of CAR-T therapy in CLL

immunotherapies, including CAR-T cell therapy, have greatly improved treatment options for patients...

More on Cytokine Release Syndrome toxicities associated with CAR-T-cell therapy.

likelihood of a patient experiencing severe CRS depends on patient-, tumor-, and CART-related...

Starting CAR-T therapy for my relapsing CLL

innovative CAR-T therapy as part of a phase I/II clinical trial. I am confident that this CAR-T...

Encouraging phase 1 trial results for GLPG5201, a CAR T-cell therapy

GLPG5201, a CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia...