Gadolinium enhancement necessity?: I've always... - AMN EASIER

AMN EASIER

1,312 members1,165 posts

Gadolinium enhancement necessity?

Aaron98 profile image
6 Replies

I've always understood (perhaps incorrectly) that gadolinium enhancement was necessary in our annual MRIs to determine enhancing brain lesions. As I went to schedule my annual MRI this time, my local neurologist told me the following:

"Contrast is only slightly helpful and I often do without contrast imaging in follow-ups of most conditions where seeing progressive lesions (T2 / FLAIR) would preceed any contrast enhancing lesions. While contrast is not harmful at this time, repetitive frequent contrast use can stay around in the brain longer than expected and there is concern this may increase neurologic symptoms (tremors, movement disorders)."

What do the AMN specialists say about this? Does anyone know? Thank you!

Written by
Aaron98 profile image
Aaron98
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
6 Replies
bluejadedwho profile image
bluejadedwho

I had just found out from a friend that contrast is important. I requested it, and they said it wasn’t necessary

monkeybus profile image
monkeybus

I have an MRI every six months. My neurologist (who is only too happy to milk my insurance) only requestested the Gandolinium when he thought it looked like one of my brain lesions was growing.

That was a few a few years ago now. He has never mentioned it since. I had forgotten all about it until you mentioned it.

3WheelWonder profile image
3WheelWonder in reply to monkeybus

Milk your insurance?? Never! 😁

Mamring profile image
Mamring

According to Dr. Troy Lund and his leukodystrophy team at University of Minnesota, gadolinium enhancement is imperative to proper brain MRIs for detecting lesions. My son went to Duke Medical Center for MRIs with no enhancement, and they immediately wanted him to have bone marrow transplant, because they misread the MRI.

StevenSims profile image
StevenSims

It very important to have it has it shows that the disease is active!

SongStream profile image
SongStream in reply to StevenSims

I agree. Since I showed brain inflammation in 9/2020, the contrast shows an active lesion or inflammation and/or progression. Since then while on the Min-102 trial, (I was 1 of the 6 who developed adult cerebral ALD while on the placebo) I have had and will have an MRI every 3 mos until August. Prior to this, I always had an annual MRI with contrast as recommended. One should be concerned about contrast solution if one has kidney disease. No other warning has been advised and I have been fine since 2020, if ever so grateful. More information will be published at end of year concerning Min-102 and I have since been on the actual drug like all.

You may also like...

I saw Ken, Aaron, and Songstream at ALD connect annual meeting today.

for people with ALD/AMN and ask questions about Min-102, Brain MRI with contrast, and future...

MIN-102 update: summer 2022

usual 6 minute walking and balance trials, the annual MRI scan and echocardiogram and the...

New Here. Elevated VLCFA, Possible AMN. California Surfer:)

first and then it progressed to more neurological? My MRI shows 4 lesions on the frontal lobe. Does...

Bone marrow trans plant is a go!!!

say let’s get this thing going to help stop the lesions and see what comes of it! So now I’m a...

I Crossed Over into Adult Cerebral ALD

Update to my previous post \\"Brain Inflammation\\". I went to my last MIN-102 follow up and had an...