I am age 66. had whack-a-mole radiation about 2,5 yrs ago (yo my left acetabulum/hip) when PSA began to rise after 10 -11 yrs on ADT (Lupron for 12 and Abiraterone for most of that time).
This time, Pet/CT indicates 1 of my 2 vertebral tumors is the culprit for my PSA rise over the last 2 yrs. PSA measured .35 2 weeks ago and was .20 just 11 weeks earlier so the doubling time most recently was increasing to approx. 3 months. The culprit for the rise in PSA this time appears from the reports to be 1 of my 2 vertebral tumors.
In addition to adding a new treatment such as chemo or some other, would whack-a-mole make sense once again (this time for the vertebral tumor)? From what I have read, radiation of vertebrae is typically warranted when the vertebra(e) cause pain. But, I am not experiencing any pain, unless the intermittent neck pain I have in the mornings is a result of the vertebral tumor.
I appreciate your responses.
Written by
Skilover
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
(edited-did not like my tone). I have come to reject the often used broad brush whack-a-mole labeling (I have used it). I think in terms of removing tumor burden.
Coming on seven years since I had six cancerous pelvic lymph nodes removed in my third treatment, salvage ePLND. uPSA holding 0.03X, no ADT. IMO a lot goes into this treatment decision - one I consider very viable.
Given that there is no proven benefit, safety is paramount. If safe, why not? I find the data on systemic treatment (like hormone treatment, chemo, Xofigo) more convincing. Where there is some cancer that you can see, there is a lot more that you can't see.
On advice from MO and RO I had SBRT to 4 mets about 8 months ago when my PSA started to rise (from about .45 to 1.0) over about 10 months and a PSMA PET scan showed some increased avidity in the mets. After SBRT my PSA started to drop straight away and returned to pre-rise level, which is my ‘normal’ as I still have prostate and it’s enlarged. One of the mets was in a lumbar vertebrae. Others were in pelvic region. No side effect from treatment which was ‘easy’ and I’ve been told I can have SBRT again if I need it for other mets. Hope this helps.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.