Surgery vs SBRT Cyberknife: Hubs... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,023 members26,204 posts

Surgery vs SBRT Cyberknife

Pride123 profile image
18 Replies

Hubs diagnosed 11/15/23. 2 of 12 positive. Gleason 6 and 7. PSA 3.7-4.2. Met with Surgeon first, "slow growing, non aggressive" he believes is contained by looking at margins and pathology. Met with Radiology Oncologist, "favorable intermediate risk, non aggressive" he believes it is contained. Both said surgery or radiation are good options, but RO recommended surgery based on Hubs age, 59 and otherwise healthy, and also said if he has recurrence or develops a secondary cancer, radiation would be off the table in the future after SBRT. Hubs had hoped to go SBRT route, so when RO recommended surgery it was a blow. The decision is really a toss up! Take the chance of not developing cancer in the future and go with SBRT Cyberknife, or surgery, with the knows side effects? How is he supposed to make this decision? Trust the Professional? Then I read success stories here from SBRT! It's agonizing! Can anyone give their experience if faced with same scenario? Thank you!

Written by
Pride123 profile image
Pride123
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
18 Replies
pd63 profile image
pd63

What is the cancer volume have you considered AS, you have plenty time to decide, get second/third opinions.Take a deep breath and don't panic, prognosis is very good in your case

Pride123 profile image
Pride123 in reply to pd63

What is AS? Sorry, newbie here

pd63 profile image
pd63 in reply to Pride123

Active surveillance

Pride123 profile image
Pride123 in reply to pd63

Ahh yes. I knew that 🙄 I am a worrier! The thought of cancer inside my man, and the possibility of spreading, is terrifying. Both the Surgeon and RO said they do not recommend it. I think if Hubs had his way that would be his choice, because he does not want to believe he has cancer 😊

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

I was 57 when I had SBRT 14 years ago. No lasting side effects of treatment.

The "age" thing is a non-starter. Younger men do better with any therapy - RP or RT. When we are younger, our tissues are more resilient. But 20% of men are left permanently incontinent by RP, and 65% of previously potent men are left impotent. Younger men suffer more from both of these side effects of RP.

"...also said if he has recurrence or develops a secondary cancer, radiation would be off the table in the future after SBRT. " This is just incorrect. See this:

prostatecancer.news/2016/08...

More to the point, salvage is almost entirely unnecessary with the very high cure rates.

prostatecancer.news/2018/10...

Secondary cancers do not occur with SBRT:

thegreenjournal.com/article...

It is troubling to me that the RO you spoke to did not know any of this.

babychi profile image
babychi

I’d want a second opinion. He might not need any treatment. Surgeons just want to do surgery in our experience.

pakb profile image
pakb

You might want to also ask in the Prostate Cancer group here- more in that group might be in your boat with lower Gleason and no metastasis. But great guys in both group to help give their perspective!

Pride123 profile image
Pride123 in reply to pakb

Newbie here, that's who I thought I was asking, ha! Help?

HikerWife profile image
HikerWife in reply to Pride123

Hi - this is the Advanced PCa group, so many/most of the guys here have Stage IV cancer (distant metastases). It's a great group, with a lot of reliable info available. So don't leave yet! I did a quick look, and this *might* be the group for less advanced PCa: healthunlocked.com/prostate...

Pride123 profile image
Pride123 in reply to HikerWife

Well. I feel bad. My sincere apologies for posting in this group, I would never want to make anyone feel worse with our "good" numbers. As soon as I have the time I will search the other group, thank you so much!

pakb profile image
pakb in reply to Pride123

Absolutely no worries! This group will be more than happy to help. Never hurts to search in both groups. 💙

bobdc6 profile image
bobdc6

I had radiation (proton) for a small contained G 4+5 in 2017, so far no side effects other than no sex drive, PSA undetectable. I figured I'd skip the surgery part since it seems to always be followed by radiation. I'm 82.

maley2711 profile image
maley2711

There are now some very well-done studies on the AS option for men with your hubby's diagnosis. It is late, and I am lazy, so please Google or this search option........

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Try something like " active surveillance results conclusion prostate cancer" .

IMHO, the fact that AS wasn't even offered is almost malpractice at this time> Consider a different medical team ?

There is LITTLE likelihood that this will be life-ending over the next 15 years....even with NO initial treatment. Did either Doc offer you any numbers? Check the Memorial Sloan prostate cancer pre RP nomogram and the the MSK prostate cancer life expectancy(without treatment) nomogram. Problem with our fee for service healthcare system.....no treatments, lower MD income ! Best of luck on a DIFFICULT decision..the C word is scary for sure.

ron_bucher profile image
ron_bucher

At his age, he is wise to think ahead about contingency plans if/when Plan A doesn't cure it. That "plan ahead" thinking has helped me keep my testosterone since being diagnosed at 54.

Pride123 profile image
Pride123 in reply to ron_bucher

Agree! The RO said that there is a less than 1% chance of getting cancer DUE to the SBRT, but that if he develops unrelated cancer in the future, radiation would be off the table, so we are definitely considering the future with this important decision. I honestly don't know how he is supposed to make the right decision based on the information we've been given. Of course he doesn't WANT surgery, but wants it gone and cured. Realizing there are no guarantees, of course, with either option. I'm searching for someone to give a third opinion.

pd63 profile image
pd63 in reply to Pride123

If no surgery it's either RT or AS, there's no 100% guarantee of a cure

ron_bucher profile image
ron_bucher in reply to Pride123

As one of my friends says: "that's why all the docs turn to the guy in the room who knows the least about it to decide on the treatment(s)"

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

Like all of us, your dear husband's thinking is "I want the damn cancer out".....He has to make a choice on what to do .... so he's the only one who can make that choice... Like ron_bucher's friend said: "your dear husband is the one in the room who knows the least'....Remember God is on his (and your) side............

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

You may also like...

How do I choose between Cyberknife (SBRT) monotherapy vs HDR Brachytherapy+EBRT?

operated or radiated before. Currently am being offered: 1) 5 fraction Cyberknife (SBRT) therapy...

Surgery vs Radiation: seminal vesicle invasion

prostate cancer in August 2019. Initial PSA 22 (free PSA 29). Gleason score 8; T3 (or 4). Cancer...

SBRT to surgical bed and WPRT (Excalibur Trial) vs IMRT

metastasis noted has lead me to the decision for SRT, either SBRT or IMRT. I've been on Eligard...

SBRT , successes , side effects

An update to our RO visit yesterday, we met with the radiology oncologist to review the PSMA Pet...

Need opinions regarding sbrt prior to Lu 177

getting program started . My radiation oncologist feels he can radiate the few Mets I have with a...