I saw my PSA suddenly rise to 3.67 in January 2023. My PMD was not overly concerned as it was under 4. His plan was to repeat it in 6 months. I will also not I was on Tamsulosin and Finasteride for some time at that point for urinary frequency. That started several years before (at that time I was a somewhat functioning alcoholic) and I now question if the initial frequency issues were related to massive consumption of alcohol. In July I had the repeat PSA and the level had increased to 20.76. I was referred to a Urologist who did a DRE that indicated a right sided area of concern, he ordered a repeat PSA and scheduled a Biopsy. The repeats PSA showed an increase from July 26th to August 22nd level of 25.66. The Biopsy was done August 30. Results showed a Gleason 4+4 -Gleason 8. I will add that on July 28 I had a routine Low dose Lung scan that showed a 4cm long mass on the left 7th rib. A follow up bone scan showed 4 rib mass' and 2 pelvic mass'. I immediately started on Bicalutamide. I had a DNA test done and that was negative. On September 27 I had my first 6-month injection of Eligard. And finally on October 12 was able to start on Erleada. The delay in Erleada was due to cost and my ability to pay for it. Fortunately the manufacturer had a program to provide it for a year. A follow up visit to Urologist on November 27 resulted in discontinuing Finasteride and a PSA done on Dec 1st showed a decrease to 0.42. I was referred to an Oncologist for possible Triplet Therapy with Docetaxel. Another PSA on December 27th revealed another decrease to 0.24.
Here is my question! The Oncologist did not feel Triplet therapy was necessary now. He said the good result of the ADT and high quality of life I was enjoying did not warrant chemo. He also said that when ADT failed, he could start it at that time. He also said he would never do Triplet therapy with Erleada because it had not been studied. He further said if he had seen me at initial diagnosis, he would have started docetaxel at that time! I did not get a warm fuzzy feeling from his conclusions, first he misread the bone scan report (which I happened to have the foresight to have brought a copy with me and presented to him for further analysis); second, I was under the impression that Triplet therapy was supposed to further improve survivability; and third his comment that he would never do it with Erleada made me wonder why he would not jump at a chance to experiment after having told me that I would never be cured and would die anyway! So, is his approach the rule of thumb or should I seek another opinion?
I really appreciate all the comments and knowledge others have on this site! I hope a few of you long time warriors have some good things to offer me. By the way I am in Western New York and have the Roswell Park Cancer Center nearby. My Urologist trained there, but is associated with a health system in nearby Rochester, NY. The oncologist trained at NY Technical Institue of Osteopathic medicine and does not list his residencies or any fellowships. Another concern of mine! Not because he is a DO, but rather because of a lack of information on education. He has been in practice for 13 years. Thanks all and Happy New Year!