Surgery in 2009, biochemical recurrence beginning 2017, and my slow-rising PSA is now up to 0.63, although my overall doubling time has remained pretty consistently over 2 years on average. My MO has a clinical trial in Phase I using a Listeria monocytogenes based vaccine, which supposedly seeks out PCa cells and attacks them like white blood cells attack bacteria. Possible side effects are fatigue and other flu-like symptoms, but so far my MO says none of the patients in the trial have reported any.
I questioned whether the slow-rising PSA could be the result of benign residual tissue, and my MO said that is possible but highly unlikely. So I requested a PSMA PET/CT (Ga68) scan before doing anything. The PSMA scan revealed "a 0.9 cm focus of intense PSMA uptake in the prostate bed, adjacent to the left posteroinferior bladder wall, corresponding to an ill-defined soft tissue nodule on CT (SUV max 40.5, average Hounsfield units 50, 4:81, 3:47)." Based on the radiology report, my MO said that I should seriously consider salvage radiation instead of his clinical trial, being that salvage radiation has been proven to be curative, and he strongly suggested that I consult with a radiation oncologist.
The first of two radiation oncologists I spoke with did a DRE and claims to have felt a nodule in the prostate bed. The second radiation oncologist ordered an MRI to complement the PSMA scan. The MRI found "a 0.9 x 0.4 cm nodule, which demonstrates marked diffusion restriction and early enhancement."
After considering radiation, I told my MO that, given the reasonable stability of my PSA, which would seem to indicate an indolent, if not benign, tumor, I would be comfortable participating in his clinical trial and keep the salvage radiation as a backup plan, should the PSADT ever become 12 months or less. My MO was not comfortable with my decision, and he asked me to re-reconsider radiation, and have the clinical trial be the backup plan. As to the first radiation oncologist's claim that he felt the nodule during the DRE, my MO said that if I wanted to pursue surgery instead, I should consult with a surgeon.
While I understand that image-guided radiation targeted to the nodule would be the regular standard of care at this point, I am concerned about having unnecessary treatment, where the treatment can result in unwanted side-effects or potential long-term collateral damage to the bladder or colon.
Looking to the group for suggestions, feedback, analysis, etc. on how to proceed from here -- to include whether to maintain active surveillance for now.