Declining utilization of prostate bra... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,056 members26,262 posts

Declining utilization of prostate brachytherapy.

pjoshea13 profile image
8 Replies

New U.S. study below. [1]

"We analyzed 178,837 patients {from the National Cancer Database (NCDB)} with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated between 2010 and 2015 with radiation therapy."

"During this period, the use of EBRT {external beam radiation} increased from 67% to 78%,

"BT {brachytherapy} (both monotherapy and combination with EBRT) decreased from 33% to 22%,

"BT monotherapy decreased from 25% to 16% and

"EBRT + BT decreased from 8% to 6%."

"Age >70, government funded insurance or lack of insurance, intermediate or high-risk disease and treatment at an academic center were associated with significantly lower utilization of brachytherapy .., while higher median zip code income was associated with increased use"

I wonder how the trend compares to other countries?

And how the trend has been these past 5 years?

-Patrick

[1] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/344...

Brachytherapy

. 2021 Aug 19;S1538-4721(21)00454-2. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.004. Online ahead of print.

PSA: Declining utilization of prostate brachytherapy

Lauren Andring 1 , Alison Yoder 2 , Todd Pezzi 2 , Chad Tang 2 , Rachit Kumar 3 , Usama Mahmood 4 , Gary V Walker 3

Affiliations collapse

Affiliations

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: lmandring@mdanderson.org.

2 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

3 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ.

4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, CA.

PMID: 34420862 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.004

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze rates of brachytherapy use for prostate cancer over time and evaluate patient characteristics, demographics and factors predictive for its utilization.

Methods: Data was retrospectively analyzed from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2010 and 2015. Patients were included if they had biopsy confirmed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, were treated with radiation as definitive local therapy, and were at least 18 years old. Utilization rates of external beam radiation (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT) and combination (EBRT + BT) were evaluated over time. Univariable (UVA) and backwards elimination multivariable (MVA) analysis were performed to determine characteristics predictive for brachytherapy use.

Results: We analyzed 178,837 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated between 2010 and 2015 with radiation therapy. During this period, the use of EBRT increased from 67% to 78%, BT (both monotherapy and combination with EBRT) decreased from 33% to 22%, BT monotherapy decreased from 25% to 16% and EBRT + BT decreased from 8% to 6%. Age >70, government funded insurance or lack of insurance, intermediate or high-risk disease and treatment at an academic center were associated with significantly lower utilization of brachytherapy (all p <0.001), while higher median zip code income was associated with increased use (p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis patients who were younger, had private insurance, were lower NCCN risk category and treated in non-academic cancer centers, had a higher rate of brachytherapy utilization. Notably, on both UVA and MVA brachytherapy practice decreased with increasing year of diagnosis (OR 0.881, 95% CI 0.853-0.910, p <0.001).

Conclusion: Rates of brachytherapy utilization for the treatment of prostate cancer continue to decrease over time. Treatment at an academic center was associated with reduced likelihood of brachytherapy use. This has significant implications for the training of future radiation oncology residents/fellows and direct consequences for both our patients and healthcare expenditure.

Keywords: Brachytherapy; Health-care expenditure; Prostate cancer; Radiation.

Copyright © 2021 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Written by
pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
8 Replies
cesces profile image
cesces

Hmmm

What increased?

Adt & Chemo?

Surgery?

questionanything profile image
questionanything

Do you think the decline is a result of being ineffective or for being too expensive for insurance coverage?

maley2711 profile image
maley2711 in reply to questionanything

in fact, it is more effective locally than external beam...when done correctly. Compensation for RO is less???? Certainly many men prefer to avoif general anesthesia, and choose external beam.

doc1947g profile image
doc1947g in reply to maley2711

Some people like me CAN NOT have anaesthesia due to other chronic diseases.With my emphesyma, I would die on the table.

They can use Epidural or Spinal. Not for me with my back all messed up.

So both my Urologist and my RO with my G(4+3=7) Grade 3 on 85% of the 12 cores, decided to put me on ADT 6months and VMAT-RT 20 Rx of 3Gy for a total of 60Gy on the Prostate & SV & Pelvic Lymphe Nodes..

PSA nadir is <0.01 μg/L (2021/02/11) and my latest one is 0.04 μg/L (2021/05/28).

My PSA get checked every 4 months. So next test is Sept 30.Meanwhile my Lymphoma NH Marginal Zone is on Active Surveillance.

timotur profile image
timotur

Brachy has some of the best long-term survival rates, but is a draconian procedure compared to its main rival, SBRT. I can see it not being attractive as a speciality to young interns— it takes a special mindset to want to go this path. Hope it survives as a treatment option until there’s a cure. It’s very effective for locally advanced Stg 3 cases with extensions to SV and LN’s, like mine was.

As far as HDR goes, in most cases, the procedure has been streamlined from two sessions over 36 hours, to a one-and-done session, in by 7am, out by 3pm. That’s a lot more palatable, not having to stay all night with tubes inserted into the prostate. LDR is not done as much as HDR now to my knowledge.

V10fanatic profile image
V10fanatic

Just like everything in life- you've gotta pay to play. From the study-

"while higher median zip code income was associated with increased use"

LeeLiam profile image
LeeLiam

No mention of LDR vs HDR? I would think HDR would be increasing with LDR dropping.

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

I guess the medical profession is taking their cue from seedless watermelons....

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Tuesday 08/24/2021 6:06 PM DST

You may also like...

ADT or Brachytherapy Boost - plus External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized PCa.

increase the risk of death from other causes. \\"In men with localized prostate cancer, the...

I am in need of treatment advice for my Prostate cancer

in treatment at Shaw Cancer Center in Edwards, CO for metastic prostrate cancer. After a year of...

Treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer?

September. We have a second opinion at MD Anderson Cancer center in Houston on August 31st. What is...

focused brachytherapy

very small area of cancer( Gleason 3+3 Grade 2A) with the hope of stopping the cancer very early...

Brachytherapy and cremation

Interesting news story today. It seems patients who have had brachytherapy can have difficulty...