Three related studies presented at the May 2020 ASCO showed an overall survival (OS) advantage in non-metastatic castrate-resistant PC by adding:
1) enzalutamide to ADT (vs placebo) in the PROSPER phase III study
meetinglibrary.asco.org/rec...
2) apalutamide to ADT (vs placebo) in SPARTAN Phase III
meetinglibrary.asco.org/rec...
3) darolutamide to ADT (vs placebo) in ARAMIS Phase III
meetinglibrary.asco.org/rec...
These are wonderful and actionable results. But I am left with a few questions (Isn't it always the case?!) We don't know for sure which one to choose since the cohorts were different and may not be comparable. So we can go on which had the greatest effect on OS (perhaps apalutamide?), lower serious SEs (perhaps darolutamide?), or cost and better insurance coverage (perhaps enzalutamide?).
I am unclear on just how non-metastatic CRPCa actually kills? Is it truly non-metastatic or rather micro metastatic (not yet showing up on conventional scans)? So how different is it?
And I am also curious about why DHT (5-a-reductase) inhibition via adding dutasteride or finasteride to anti-androgen regimens seem to be absent. Has this matter been definitively addressed?