When should ADT be started upon or af... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,378 members28,143 posts

When should ADT be started upon or after BCR in HSPC? An unanswered question.

MateoBeach profile image
5 Replies

Below is the commentary by Dr. Antonarakis upon the release of the most recent OS results from the SPARTAN trial of apalutamide in nmCRPC. Great results indeed! But what of those who are not yet castrate resistant?

However, note the last sentence (highlighted). An important unanswered question indeed. Should it be guided by PSADT or what?

practiceupdate.com/c/106535...

Emmanuel S Antonarakis MD:

"This study represents the mature analysis of overall survival from the SPARTAN study, a randomized trial of apalutamide versus placebo for nonmetastatic CRPC. The current analysis shows that, in addition to improving metastasis-free survival, there are now compelling data for an overall survival improvement using apalutamide for CRPC patients before the onset of metastatic disease. Taken together with the results of the PROSPER trial (enzalutamide vs placebo) and the ARAMIS trial (darolutamide vs placebo), both of which also showed a survival advantage with the use of novel antiandrogen therapy in the nonmetastatic CRPC setting, there is now substantial evidence of significant clinical benefit when using all three agents before the onset of metastatic disease. However, the question that is not answered by any of these trials is whether androgen-deprivation therapy should be started in the first place for nonmetastatic biochemically recurrent prostate cancers or what triggers should be used to decide when to start androgen-deprivation therapy in biochemically recurrent patients."

Written by
MateoBeach profile image
MateoBeach
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
5 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

TOAD attempted to answer that. I hope they will publish 10-year results.

podsart profile image
podsart in reply toTall_Allen

I was surprised in some study I thought said Xtandi did better than Apalutamide or even daralutamide in some important parameter in some study. Am I mistaken ? I know Xtandi has higher SEs.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply topodsart

There has never been a direct comparison. They've all been tested separately among different groups of patients. Here are the patient-reported outcomes in men with nHSPC:

urotoday.com/conference-hig...

urotoday.com/conference-hig...

podsart profile image
podsart in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks

GP24 profile image
GP24

This analysis did not find a difference for early vs late:

redjournal.org/article/S036...

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

ARASENS Trial

I am Hormone sensitive so far Currently on Lupron and Zytiga, is Darolutamide significantly...

Apalutamide for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Not surprising - question is the relative performance vs Abi or Enz (or combination with other...
snoraste profile image

How Long Does the FDA’s Real-Time Oncology Review Program Take to Approve New Drug Applications?

In findings from the phase III TITAN trial on which the supplemental new drug application (sNDA)...
6357axbz profile image

FDA Approves Darolutamide Plus Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Other triple therapy approved by the FDA. The article has the basic results of the ARASENS trial....
tango65 profile image

When Is ADT Right for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer? Study suggest early initiation may not "meaningfully" improve survival

In a retrospective study, men with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of less than...
George71 profile image