a major development in a decades lon... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,004 members26,181 posts

a major development in a decades long quest to develop a treatment that destroys tumors without the debilitating side effects of chemo.

George71 profile image
28 Replies

A cancer therapy invented at Rice University has crossed a milestone in clinical trials, a major development in a decadeslong quest to develop a treatment that destroys tumors without the debilitating side effects of chemotherapy, invasive surgery and radiation.

Thirteen of the first 15 prostate cancer patients treated in a clinical trial of the nanoparticle-based, focal therapy showed no detectable signs of cancer a year after treatment, according to a study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The paper presents the results from 16 patients who were treated at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. It is believed to be the first published clinical study of a photothermal cancer therapy -- one that uses illuminated nanoparticles to heat and destroy tumors -- in a refereed scientific journal, said the study's authors.

In the study, 16 men ages 58 to 79 with low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer agreed to participate in a trial of AuroLase Therapy, a focal ablation treatment that uses gold nanoparticles to heat and destroy tumors. Fifteen of the 16 patients underwent the two-day treatment, receiving an intravenous infusion of nanoparticles on day one and undergoing an image-guided ablation treatment on day two. All of the patients went home on the day of the treatment and returned for follow-up tests at three months, six months and one year after treatment. Of the 15 who completed treatment, only two showed detectable signs of cancer in follow-up biopsies and MRIs one year later.

"Gold-silica nanoshell infusion allows for a focused therapy that treats the cancer while sparing the rest of the prostate, thus preserving a patient's quality of life by reducing unwanted side effects, which could include erectile dysfunction and/or the leakage of urine," said study lead author and trial principal investigator Dr. Ardeshir Rastinehad, associate professor of urology and radiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

The trial, which is ongoing and has treated 44 patients at Mount Sinai and two other clinical sites in Michigan and Texas, is the culmination of a 20-year quest by Rice University engineer and nanoscientist Naomi Halas and Duke University bioengineer Jennifer West. Halas and West, co-authors of the new study, first envisioned the nanoparticle-based therapy around 2000 while working together in Rice's Brown School of Engineering.

The particles, tiny silica spheres with a thin outer layer of gold, are called nanoshells. They are about 50 times smaller than a red blood cell, and Halas invented them at Rice in 1997. By varying the thickness of the gold shell, Halas had shown she could tune nanoshells to interact with specific wavelengths of light. Around 2000, she and West invented a method of destroying cancer cells by heating nanoshells with a low-power, near-infrared laser that could pass harmlessly through healthy tissue.

The work garnered national awards and press coverage, and by the early 2000s Halas and West had co-founded a Houston-based startup, Nanospectra Biosciences, to develop the technology for clinical use.

Around that time, Halas' father, then 85, was diagnosed with prostate cancer.

"He had profound hearing loss and was legally blind, so I had to be the communications link between him and his urologist," Halas said. "I know a lot about what people go through with prostate cancer because of my dad."

Halas said she'll never forget when her father asked if her invention might be the answer for his prostate cancer.

"He knew about nanoshells," she said. "The story had been in Business Week, and he had posted the clipping on a wall in his office."

At the time, Nanospectra was still conducting the necessary pre-clinical work to show that nanoshells could be safely used in humans.

Two years after his radiation therapy, it became almost impossible for him to urinate.

"It was terrible," Halas recalled. "He was in and out of the hospital weekly. The doctor would catheterize him. He'd go home. Things would be fine for a few days, and then he'd have to go to the emergency room. It was unbelievable what he went through."

She vividly recalls a conversation that still motivates her.

"He said to me, 'If you could prevent just one person from having to go through the hell that I went through, it would be worth it,'" Halas said.

From the outset, West and Halas had imagined a treatment that would destroy cancer without the debilitating side effects often associated with chemotherapy, invasive surgery and radiation. And that had been borne out in their early studies in cell cultures and mice.

"The science hasn't changed," West said. "If you look back to our original PNAS paper, where we did the first animal studies, there's nothing fundamentally different in the science."

But getting clinical trials approved by the Food and Drug Administration was not easy, in part because the technology was groundbreaking.

"We were the first, really engineered nanoparticle to go into human beings," West said. "In the beginning, the FDA wasn't sure how to handle these types of materials. We had something that looked like an injectable liquid in an IV bag. Was it a drug or a device? There was a point in time where the FDA was discussing creating a whole new division just for nano."

In the end, the agency opted to regulate the treatment, which Nanospectra branded as AuroLase Therapy, as a medical device. Clinical trials focused on safety began almost 10 years ago with a study in late-stage head and neck cancer. Halas said Nanospectra learned valuable lessons at every step, but she said it was another big advance -- this one in medical imaging -- that set the stage for the success in prostate cancer.

In 2011, researchers from the National Institutes of Health published results of a new technique that combined ultrasound and MRI imaging to resolve prostate tumors with millimeter-scale precision, Halas said. Clinicians began adoption of the technique for "fusion biopsies," a procedure for targeting needle biopsies to the specific site of suspected tumors.

One of the lead researchers working to develop fusion biopsy technology was Rastinehad, who joined Mount Sinai in 2015 and was an early proponent of using the fusion imaging platform for "focal therapy," minimally invasive treatment that could target tumors without the risks of incontinence and impotency that were associated with whole-gland treatments like surgical removal of the prostate or radiation.

For Halas and West, the newly published study is another, important step in a 20-year journey that's always been personal and deeply moving.

"Tropical Storm Allison hit while we were doing our earliest animal experiments in the Texas Medical Center," West recalled. "Many of the MRI instruments in animal research facilities were destroyed, and we ended up having to run MRIs on our mice in the same facilities they were using to image patients. It was profoundly moving to see the impact that cancer was having on people, to be waiting there with them and think that what we were developing might one day, hopefully, really help them."

Halas' father died several years ago, but she said she thinks about him every day.

"There's a bigger picture here," she said. "This (study) is 16 men, but when does it get to be 16,000? Sixteen million? Because 1 in 9 men are going to have to deal with this in their lifetime. The thought that this treatment could alleviate the side effects, and the misery, that my dad experienced is truly heartwarming."

West said the results show what is possible when physicians and engineers work together to solve problems.

"This work demonstrates the power of collaboration across engineering and medicine," she said. "It shows how collaboration can enable the translation of exciting new technologies into clinical medicine to improve the lives of patients."

sciencedaily.com/releases/2...

Written by
George71 profile image
George71
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
28 Replies
tango65 profile image
tango65

Thanks George, very interesting. Best of luck,

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz

Thanks for the posting George. I saw a blurb about this in the local paper while in Houston earlier this year receiving IMRT and it sounded promising. Seems like it’s come to fruition for localized cancer. I wonder what they have to say about it’s use for metastatic PCa...

snoraste profile image
snoraste

interesting. I wonder what the mechanism of action is. Do they heat up ALL, or there's a way they attach the particles to cancer cells only, similar to PSMA.

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to snoraste

The nano particles go everywhere. The are inert and harmless. The low powered laser is focused on that portion of the prostate that has the cancer tumor. The light interacts with the nanoparticles there to heat them up, thus destroying the tumor.

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

Exactly, it is a carpet bombing of nanoparticles....how to get it more precise...??

Don Pescado

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman

Thanks for posting science, Geeorge71.....So they infuse the nanoparticle solution on day one, and then use the infrared light for tumor ablation on day2. For individuals with Stage 4 mets identified by a sensitive scan, this could drive the disease backwards and buy time. The micromets and the CTC's are the problem... Those issues are being worked on...

Good stuff....

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

You mention mets identified by a sensitive scan. I wonder how small the mets can be and still have the laser focus on them...

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman

My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that some scans get down to about 4 mm--essentially 1/8 of an inch in diameter...the laser uses infrared light which is light not seen with the naked eye--it is used in infrared sauna--from Mayo--see below:

mayoclinic.org/healthy-life...

Could someone with Stage 4 mets be given the laser treatment or could even a more intense infrared sauna be developed to hit smaller mets? It has some real potential just hitting mets visible down to 4 mm... I believe the heat generated is about 101 or 102 degrees, which is not high enough to damage normal tissues, but kills tumor cells...

This has real potential and beyond low/intermediate disease. Could this be used instead of chemo first? Potentially, it could... My concern is how do we know for sure it gets to all tumors, and that is where I wonder if a fibrinogen activation protein ( common to about 30 cancers) could be attached which would guide it to the tumors directly...The plot thickens in a good way...

This is all, in my opinion, and we're stuck waiting...as usual....but still....good stuff...Thanks to George71...

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

How do we contact them to see what there thinking is about something like you suggest, I.e., an infrared sauna?

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

I would try and contact the 3 authors of the study-- lead author and trial principal investigator Dr. Ardeshir Rastinehad, associate professor of urology and radiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Rice University engineer and nanoscientist Naomi Halas and Duke University bioengineer Jennifer West.

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

I will try to contact them and report back. If you’re correct about 101 or 102 degrees as the amount of heat generated, that’s equivalent to a high fever so very doable over the entire body, maybe in the infrared sauna as you suggest.

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

The nanoparticles require more of a laser I am thinking, so the sauna bath would be like a sauna laser bath to activate the nanoparticles if one were trying for a whole body treatment....I have thought about the infrared sauna though for relaxation and heat for the old bones....

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

I doubt if they could do whole body without killing healthy tissue. I’ll get an email off the those three sometime today

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

I do not believe this kills healthy tissue in any way...healthy tissues can sustain a temp of 103 degrees, even a little more....The deep infrared laser is to penetrate past shallower tissues to get where the tumor is....

Thank you for taking the time to write these individuals....

This could be part of a way to break the whole ADT cycle...instead of starting with ADT, one could do the nanoparticle treatment, after initially receiving the CAR-T treatment with vaccine... maybe add SM-88 into that mix and wait for the disease to progress before starting ADT....it might take several years...adding precious time to our lives....

All the best,

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

Seems promising. Kinda surprised few others have shown interest...

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

The science is not for everyone ....some have no science background....mine is deeply steeped in science and medicine.... Thus, my interest.... The Science is Coming !!! and it gives me.... HOPE !!!! Love that Science, my man.... Love it !!!

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

Just sent off email to the nano team. We’ll see...

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

Thanks again...

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

Here’s what I sent (u could probably done better)

Dear Doctors, Engineers and Scientists,

Having recently read the report on your ground breaking work and success in using nanoparticals in treating localized Prostate Cancer a group of us with Stage 4 metastatic PCa would like to know your thoughts about applying this same technology to our metastases. For individuals with Stage 4 mets identified by a sensitive scan, this could drive the disease backwards and buy time provided the laser could be accurately focused on these metastatic tumors. The micromets and the CTC's would still be the problem so to go a step farther could a laser, whole body sauna bath, such as used at Mayo - -see below

mayoclinic.org/healthy-life...

used to activate the nanoparticles if one were trying for a whole body?

We would greatly appreciate your thoughts on where you may be looking to take this technology.

Regards,

Many Stage 4 metastatic PCa Patients

PS: I was not able to locate the email address forArdeshir Rastinehad, DO, Associate Professor of Urology, and Radiology, at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai so we would appreciate if you could forward him this email. Thank-you.

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

No, my friend....That is wonderful work and hopefully, after some conceptualizing on their part, we will have an answer.... The potential is mind boggling....The CTC's could be dealt with by a laser...in melanoma, they can kill 96% of CTC's in 8 hours...if they could do that with PCa, and then add this treatment...it could buy people years...and more years on the repeat....and then again....really good stuff....

Thanks,

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

We didn’t have to wait long. Here is a response tho not from any of the principles. Sounds like gibberish to me...Sounds like he didn’t read or understand my questions.

Hello

I am the CMO at Nanospectra.

I am sensitive to your plight

As youvare likely aware with stage 4 (m+) disease Thor likely is occult micro metastasis present.

This in your situation focal therapy is in general of little benefit and we utilize systemic approaches which can treat all the cancer.

Good luck in your journey.

Michael

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

Thanks for trying....they are refusing to look at this because of micromets with no interest in looking at the good that could be done for people with advanced disease...This could wipe out mets early and buy time.... frustrating.....

Don Pescado

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to NPfisherman

The principal investigator also replied:

Thank you for the email. I appreciate you reaching out to us. Unfortunately, due to the technologies ability to focally treat small areas within the prostate at this time treating systemic or metastatic disease would not be feasible. However, please keep an eye on our progress.

Warm Regards,

Dr Art Rastinehad

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to 6357axbz

That sounds a bit more promising...Thanks for your efforts...

All the best,

Don Pescado

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to NPfisherman

You're still here... Good, Holly is on the way ....

See... I guessed it before.... you're a plummer who's background is deeply steeped in science and medicing.... Knew it all the time..... SOB

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor

j-o-h-n Monday 09/02/2019 10:08 AM DST - Pinnes

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman in reply to j-o-h-n

I've done some plumbing in my day...there is a science to it....

Don Pescado

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to NPfisherman

Yep, we all have plumbing problems now....

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Monday 09/02/2019 1:27 PM DST - Pinnes

tallguy2 profile image
tallguy2

Thanks for posting this!

You may also like...

Rice University professor waits on FDA to approve what she hopes will be a cure for prostate cancer

what she hopes may be a cure for prostate cancer. It's a treatment method involving nanoparticles,...

Mitigating chemo side effects

Chemo with Docetaxel - side effects

I started triple therapy over a month ago with Eligard and Nubeqa, Zometa for bones, and Docetaxel...

Cabazitaxel and chemo side effects

on second line chemo for castrate resistant prostate cancer. He is currently lacking a lot of...

Is chemo an effective treatment for PCa?

supporting chemotherapy as a life extending treatment for Prostate Cancer. Thank you in advance.