Lab has changed reference ranges : Hi all, I try... - Thyroid UK

Thyroid UK

141,246 members166,490 posts

Lab has changed reference ranges

Wired123 profile image
16 Replies

Hi all,

I try to keep going to the same clinic so blood tests retain comparability.

Annoyingly the clinic has changed its reference range.

T4 starts at 9.0 now instead of 12.0.

T3 tops out at 5.7 whereas before it was 6.8.

Now I’m confused when comparing results in different points in time.

I’ll post my results in a later post but trying to understand, for example, if someone had a T3 of 6.5, that would be within the old reference range but now would come up as outside the range based on the new range.

So potentially someone could end up with a reduced dose due to change in reference range?

With so few patients on T3 treatment anyway, I wonder if the reference ranges take into account the T3 levels of such patients given ref ranges generally strip out the top and bottom 2.5% of the population.

Written by
Wired123 profile image
Wired123
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
16 Replies
helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator

If someone had a result of 6.5, just under top of range, then we should expect one of two possibilities:

A result just under the top of the new reference interval. Maybe about 5.5. If the reference interval is performing similarly just the numbers have changed, this is likely.

Or a result similar to 6.5 but now falling outwith the reference interval. This would suggest that the analysis is more rigorous and some results which were formerly high-ish are now being excluded.

Wired123 profile image
Wired123 in reply tohelvella

Interesting so in scenario 1 the person would have a different result even if they did the result a day apart (ie, the day before ref range changed and the day of the change in ref range). So in effect 2 things are changing at the same time.

How does this work? I thought the ref ranges were simply based on the population passing through that lab’s doors and the top and bottom 2.5% of results (outliers) are excluded to fix the range. Pretty unscientific and arbitrary.

I didn’t think that the actual level the machine reports would change as the blood level is still the blood level.

helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator in reply toWired123

One classic (but hopefully historic) issue.

TSH tests were affected by antibodies to TSH itself as well as some other antibodies.

Hence, a TSH result from someone with those particular antibodies would see a higher result than if they did not have those antibodies. It would be a falsely elevated result caused by interference by antibodies.

However, two factors come into play. Some tests are more affected than others. Which makes the results somewhat random (from one manufacturers' system to another). And also on average somewhat high.

As manufacturers took action to make the testing process less susceptible to this interference, several things would happen.

Reference intervals would tighten and have lower top ends.

An individual having their blood tested before and after the test improvement might see a lower result. If they have relevant antibodies, the result should drop. But if it was a genuine result, it should remain the same but would look higher compared with the new top of reference interval. So the mean will drop but not every individual's tests will drop.

This is just one hyper-simplified example.

The process of improving and changing tests hasn't just been a single change. Tests are updated from time to time. An individual manufacturer might have updated their test two, three or more times over the years. Each update might have had an impact of reference intervals, on susceptibility to antibody interference, or both.

In the end, we really have to go with new reference intervals. And the best we can hope is to look at where in the reference interval or result lies. That is, the percentage through.

You can play around with this:

helvella - Range Calculator Spreadsheet

A spreadsheet for calculating a test result as a percentage through the reference interval (range).

This is an Excel spreadsheet but is likely to work in other spreadsheet software.

From DropBox:

dropbox.com/s/2hux0bhfw4avh...

SeasideSusie profile image
SeasideSusieRemembering

Wired23

So potentially someone could end up with a reduced dose due to change in reference range?

No, that wouldn't happen. You wouldn't have the same result if the range was different.

If the range changes then use the calculator below to work out percentage through range then compare that rather than the result.

For example:

If the range for FT4 is 12-22 and your result is 19 it would be 70% through range

If the range was 10-20 then 70% through range is 17

If the range is 7-17 then 70% through range is 14

If the range is 9-19 then 70% through range 16

So if you are 70% through one lab's range you will be 70% through another lab's range regardless of what that range is.

Calculator here: chorobytarczycy.herokuapp.c...

Wired123 profile image
Wired123 in reply toSeasideSusie

The lab isn’t changing. It’s the same lab. They have changed their ref range hence the question.

In the past I’ve seen myself get very similar results despite going to different labs, but each lab would have its own ref range based on the population that passes through it.

Would be interesting to see how the same equipment can get different ranges dependent on the genetic make up of the local population in each location.

What does the ref range look like in a majority “white” area vs say London with its more multicultural mix of ethnicities?

SeasideSusie profile image
SeasideSusieRemembering in reply toWired123

The lab isn’t changing. It’s the same lab. They have changed their ref range hence the question.

Yes, I know and it should have read

So if you are 70% through one lab range you will be 70% through another lab range regardless of what that range is

But a sneaky 's crept in as I'm using my tablet with predictive text rather than my PC.

My GP surgery changed it's range a few years ago from 11.8 - 24.6 to 7-17 and results were similar percentage through range. Similarly with using private labs with range of 12 - 22 the percentage through range is roughly the same as my surgery.

Wired123 profile image
Wired123 in reply toSeasideSusie

Ok that’s useful to know but annoying as I track my results on a spreadsheet, not just thyroid but about 25 different things and it looks like most ref ranges have changed

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply toWired123

You can probably do sum functions to convert them all to percentages so they are like for like. It’s not too difficult you just do the sum function and apply it to all the relevant cells so should be easier than doing it all one by one. It’s ages since I did all that stuff so can’t be more specific. There must be a true spreadsheet nerd on here that could help you!

SeasideSusie profile image
SeasideSusieRemembering in reply toWired123

Wired123

Yes, mine are all on a spreadsheet too. I have one page for thyroid, one for vitamins and one for "other" (I have to have regular other tests for something else), so I toggle between them when I'm adding the different tests.

I just add an extra column for the percentage.

If I've had the thyroid tests done with the private lab I just look at the result as I know the ranges are the same, if I have one done at my GP surgery with the different range I just look at the percentage.

helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator in reply toWired123

Seems possible they changed their analyser machine. That would mean many reference intervals changing.

The ones that wouldn't change are those which have been harmonised (standardised) to be the same across all labs.

PixieElv profile image
PixieElv

hi Wired123Is it the reference ranges or is it the ranges for when you are considered considered hypo/hyper?

SeasideSusie profile image
SeasideSusieRemembering in reply toPixieElv

PixieElv

Wired123 is talking about the reference ranges the lab uses for the tests that have changed.

PixieElv profile image
PixieElv in reply toSeasideSusie

Thank you. Just wouldn’t surprise me if they decide to up the threshold to be diagnosed…

SeasideSusie profile image
SeasideSusieRemembering in reply toPixieElv

Lordly, I hope not, they already did that and increased it to 10 some time ago, can't remember what it was before, I hope they don't increase it ever again.

PixieElv profile image
PixieElv in reply toSeasideSusie

If it saves them money 😞…

Partner20 profile image
Partner20

We have many tests done at different clinics and hospitals; sometimes the ranges are the same as those done at our local lab, sometimes not. Occasionally ranges themselves have changed, but it is the actual position of your result within each range that is important.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Reference ranges

I don't understand why the reference range for the particular laboratory analysing the blood is...
SailingBy profile image

Why do labs change reference ranges...?

I just compared lab results from this year and last year to previous years (going back to 2010 when...

Fingerprick tests reference ranges

Hi I've stopped taking biotin so am ready to order a fingerprint test. Try as I might to compare...
Maztee profile image

Lab reference ranges

My NHS blood test lists these reference ranges FT3: 2.5 - 5.7 FT4: 9 - 23 My private blood test...
Hyperbee profile image

Lab ranges - I don't get it?

Hello! I hope someone can help with this. It's something I've asked about before but I didn't...

Moderation team

See all
PurpleNails profile image
PurpleNailsAdministrator
Jaydee1507 profile image
Jaydee1507Administrator
SlowDragon profile image
SlowDragonAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.