Well done to today's Telegraph for having another article on this unsexy disease. Raising more awareness amongst the public can't be anything but a good thing.
Well done The Telegraph!: Well done to today's... - Thyroid UK
Well done The Telegraph!
And Mark Vanderpump is the guy who tells us that we have a somatoform disorder (we are mad) if our bloods are normal but we still complain of symptoms. What a two-faced $^&(*)@
I thought it was Tony Weetman who thought we were all mad. I hadn't realised Vanderpump was just the same.
I'm probably wrong, perhaps he doesn't agree with Weetman. But he was one of the people who decided that we should only get TSH tested and can't get NDT. I know Weetman comes across as totally awful (sort of the Prince of Endo Darkness). I'm sure someone here saw MV and had a bad experience (but again someone else had a good one). He's made some comments in Pulse...
We need lots of people to hop over and leave a comment on that article.
Thanks for posting, Churchie. I'm absolutely gobsmacked about Mark Vanderpumps comment “It is a crude test,” and his desire to have women's TSH tested at 30! Not at all what I expected to hear from him.
Hi clutter
Please could you tell me what a hemilobectomy is?
Thanks
Xx
They usually say TSH is an 'exquisite' test - flummoxed too, <shrug smiley>
here's hoping for a u-turn then!
Spare, perhaps he's read Diogenes paper and accepts the premise. It's a welcome u-turn for sure
Classic mis-interpretation.
The TSH tests have become exquisitely sensitive - meaning that they can fairly consistently measure incredibly low concentrations of the substance in blood. But that has got absolutely nothing to do with diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism - it simply means that the difference between totally suppressed TSH and "very low" TSH is an incredibly fine line with, possibly, little clinical relevance.
Rod
That is, of course, meant to be misrepresentation of the test by the medics - not you, Spare!
lol! - it's just that expression (whatever it means!) is daft!
from "exquisite" to "crude" - a bit of a difference!
then again Mr V goes onto say [the test] "does not take into account differences of height, gender or age" - eh?
reminds me that I could wake up tomorrow 6" taller and still be in 'normal' height range (but very odd for me)!
Talk about being hidden away for not many people to see! It should be in their Health section.