I’ve seen several posts from members who are pursuing localized radiation treatments and possibly even surgical removal of distant metastases in an MBC setting. My wife has a relatively conservative oncologist who seems to still believe that surgery and even radiation offer no benefit and should not be considered in an MBC setting.
I would appreciate understanding the perspectives that any of you who might have who are in this situation, and what the perspectives are of your oncologists.
I do recall seeing some papers a few years ago that seemed to suggest the thinking might be gradually changing on this, and that the selective removal of distant metastases may have some benefit to survivability, but I can’t seem to find any new data/studies on this now.
Of course, each metastasis is different. But as an example, my wife has an enlarged Hilar lymph node that is presumed to be affected by her MBC. It seems to be stable at this point, but it would seem there might be an argument to remove it while her targeted therapy is working instead of waiting for it to become an issue down the road?
Many thanks for any thoughts/experiences.