I do have the results after all. The comment says normal and the figures are 141 nmol/L >51. Can anyone tell me what they actually mean please. Thanks
Too much vitamin D? Maybe Not!!: I do have the... - PMRGCAuk
Too much vitamin D? Maybe Not!!
Written by
Omanain
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
1 Reply
•
PMRproAmbassador
I've answered over on the other post. I'll repeat it here for completeness:
'Sorry - not entirely clear what the numbers you've quoted are. Especially the >51.
I'm assuming that the 141 nmol/L is the result they got for you - and that IS higher than the normal range so not sure why they have said it is normal. The top of the NHS recommended range is 90-100 nmol/L (36-40 ng/mL) but 140 nmol/L is in no way anywhere near the toxic level which is above about 350 nmol/mL
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
Calcium with vitamin D and K?
Hello! thank you again for all your continued support and comradeship.
I am currently quite excited
Vitamin D and calcium
I have had PMR for two years. I finally took
last Prednisolone tablet on 9 January and have been...
Vitamin D Supplements and Health
favourite NZ birds - taken on a lovely holiday we are having - in the South Island. This bird and...
Vitamin D supplement
Vitamin D and Fatigue
Calcium and Vitamin D
Too much calcium in blood
