Critical thinking often incorporates what if questions.
What if current understanding of how to treat B12 is overly influenced by what was the best treatment available 60 years ago when cynocabalamin first synthesized and only available in injections which at the time meant a doctor involved?
Cynocabalamin was then manufactured in a pill form and it is reasonable to assume that was a disaster and we are still seeing the effects of doctors using oral administration.
What if the reversing out and the body's using up co factors is the result of starving the body of B12 except for 6 hours a day or every other day?
What if sublingual is more effective taken every 6 hours than an injection every other day or even once a day?
Now the big question is what reason is there not to try a sublingual trial of every 6 hours from when I get up until I go to sleep at night. Actually the question is 4 hours 6 hours is just being conservative for no reason.
The only risk I can think of is that it may overtax my body and I heal too fast . I feel I have enough experience to evaluate that and make any changes warranted.
There is also the risk of unintended consequences as with anything.
I have experience with many trials of different forms and administration of B12
I have an ideal situation in that I have little pressure and freedom to deal with any untold reactions. Other than I am in the UK and not the USA.
I feel better than I have in years after administering back to back sublingual doses yesterday. So emotionally I want more of it.
They way I might screw up is to try and do to much to prove I am OK when I am not.
I am going for it. Every 6 hours when I am awake.