Just got back home from my appointment at the fracture clinic. The big toe is dislocated but there are no breaks anywhere. The consultant said that providing I can walk reasonably ok, then he would prefer not to operate because of my RA. He went on to say what a terrible disease RA is, and if surgery is performed then complications can arise due to things such as skin condition, not sure why..perhaps something to do with elasticity or the healing process(?), plus the weird types and combinations of medication we take and lung disease. His biggest concern seemed to be post-op antibiotic resistant infections. I think he mentioned one or two other things but I can't recall what they were...that was more than enough anyway! He did say that if my feet deteriorate further then he would operate, but only as a last resort.
All well and good I suppose, at least as far as deciding whether or not to have surgery goes. Even though I'm only too aware of how bad a disease RA can be and knew there was some risk involved with surgery, I found it quite depressing hearing a consultant, other than my rheumy, actually telling me what a terrible disease RA is then reeling off a bunch of related negatives. Think I would have preferred having to decide whether to have surgery or not.
Not that I'm complaining as it can only be a good thing, but it does seem a bit odd how I was seen so quickly when it was nothing urgent.