An antibody for myelofibrosis – “that’s a true d... - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,434 members14,381 posts

An antibody for myelofibrosis – “that’s a true discovery”

socrates_8 profile image
30 Replies

Recently, one of our MATES members showed me this (extract) article (MiaGrace), & I believe that many others might wish to see it too...

A new monoclonal antibody, discovered by accident by Adelaide researchers, could become the world’s first effective treatment for primary myelofibrosis (MF).

Associate Professor Daniel Thomas

And if all goes well, early phase clinical trials for the novel therapy could start “within a year”, and scores of people in Australia and overseas have already put up their hands to go on the studies.

The current treatment for MF only controls symptoms and this form of blood cancer can progress quickly over a few years, resulting in severe fibrosis of the bone marrow. In about 20% of people with myelofibrosis, if left unchecked, this severe type of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) can transform to acute leukaemia.

“We still don’t know why some patients progress quickly and some slowly. That’s why I study it,” said Associate Professor Daniel Thomas, a clinical haematologist and pathologist who leads the Myeloid Metabolism Laboratory at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute as an Associate Professor of Medicine and was part of the discovery team.

“By understanding myelofibrosis, you have the potential to discover breakthrough treatments for both acute leukaemia and diseases caused by fibrosis.

“The myelofibrosis antibody is a big step forward because it proves that immunotherapy can actually stop the bad cells from dividing. This is significant because myelofibrosis is a rare disease that not many people have done much work on until now, so it continues to be a great unmet need.”

Speaking at the New Directions in Leukaemia Research (NDLR)* meeting in Brisbane (30 May-1 June 2022) Dr Thomas explained the significance of this work so far, which “showed for the first time ‘proof-of-principle’, using carefully collected patient samples, that you can definitely target myelofibrosis with antibody therapy”.

“We, and other scientists, have wondered if this was possible for a while,” he said. “If you don’t believe that something is possible, then generally nothing changes. Science is funny like that.”

“But no one knew for sure whether the mutant protein that causes the disease actually gets outside the cell and then sends a signal back in, telling it to divide uncontrollably.

“We’re the first to really have strong data that you can block growth of the bad cells (mutant platelet-forming stem cells) that produce the symptoms, and that’s extremely encouraging for patients because we’ve got excellent evidence that it doesn’t hurt normal, good blood stem cells.”

“It really was serendipitous,” said Dr Thomas describing the discovery.

“It was firstly because we were working with some outstanding biochemists (Denis Tvorogov, Frank Stomski) and working in the laboratory of Professor Angel Lopez**, a longstanding mentor and PhD supervisor. Denis and Frank were making molecular tools to further our research by generating new antibodies, but never did we expect the antibody would actually block growth of the disease.

“What this means is that we think we have a surprising double hit here: an antibody likely to be effective in patients, and an antibody that is unique in that it teaches us the ‘how’ and why the disease arises. So we can now use this new understanding to develop other tools that allow us to predict and protect against the disease,” said Dr Thomas.

“As we were making an antibody to try and understand how calreticulin protein worked inside stem cells, we were completely shocked when we noticed that it actually stopped the cancer cells’ growth.”

Dr Thomas first assumed the results were a mistake, thinking “this is too good to be true”.

“We decided we needed to repeat it, and the results repeated, and we did it in multiple different ways and with other mutations also found in myelofibrosis,” he explained.

“Then we used patient samples that all had calreticulin mutations and that worked as well. Then we went back to normal, healthy stem cells and it did not stop them growing,” said Dr Thomas.

“It’s quite rare to get such a wide therapeutic window of opportunity.”

“I am just so happy our team kept working so hard despite all the setbacks, supply disruptions, and lockdowns during COVID. There are so many critical parts of a good team. Australia needs to re-invest in basic biochemistry as well as encouraging doctors to pursue research,” said Dr Thomas.

Now this monoclonal antibody and a humanised version is being tested in pre-clinical models, “to make sure it’s safe before clinical trial and upscaling”.

“We will only go forward if I’m convinced it’s not toxic, that it works at removing the nasty myelofibrosis cells, and we can mass-produce the antibody without losing effect,” said Dr Thomas.

“That’s called good manufacturing and quality control for biological products, something in which Australia is finally now gaining skills and experience. In some ways, COVID has accelerated the need for Australians to become skilled manufacturers again. Unfortunately, many useful antibody therapies given to cancer patients in Australia are generally made offshore.”

If all that works out, Dr Thomas, Prof. Lopez and his team need to raise sufficient funding for a clinical trial.

“Trials are expensive and there are many unexpected costs including the registration paperwork to be given a license to do a first-in-human study, antibody manufacturing, distribution, and careful trial monitoring,” said Dr Thomas who has already been contacted by numerous MF patients from around the world asking if they can go on a clinical trial for this potential treatment.

“That’s unheard of. Many of them are under 50 years old and don’t have many [treatment] choices.

“I think this [antibody] or a similar one that was even more potent could definitely control this particular type of myelofibrosis and it would have a high chance of slowing down the disease and improving symptom"

People with CALR positive myelofibrosis who are interested in the potential MF clinical trial are encouraged to email Dr Thomas directly on: haematology.trials@sahmri.com

Medical or science students who want to learn more about building new types of cancer therapy can contact Dr Thomas: daniel.thomas@adelaide.edu.au

Reference

Tvorogov D, Thompson-Peach CAL, Foßelteder J, et al. Targeting human CALR-mutated MPN progenitors with a neoepitope-directed monoclonal antibody. EMBO Reports. 2022 Apr;23(4):e52904. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202152904

Written by
socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
30 Replies
NedKel65 profile image
NedKel65

Hi Steve,What exciting news !

AUS scientists and biochemistry teams are brilliant !

Here’s hoping trials can start with the right funding 🥰

Happy days ahead

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to NedKel65

It does look most promising thus far... There are still a few small fixes, as I understand things but extremely promising all the same... 8-)

Steve

bruddery profile image
bruddery

Hi Steve, what can I say that other haven’t! It really is the best ever news. Let’s hope things continue in such a positive way and that the necessary funding is found. I wish you and all the team the very best of luck and continued success, and thank you all for pursuing this very important research. Good luck to you all. Janice

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to bruddery

Cheers Janice... :-)

Yes, looks really encouraging does it not... ?

Best wishes all

Steve

Ettiel profile image
Ettiel

Hey Steve,This is potentially fantastic news! A real breakthrough! 👏 Thanks so much for posting. Hope you’ve put your name down for the trials! Also hope you’re doing well and getting out on the bike.

Take care,

Ettiel 👍😊🌻

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to Ettiel

Hey Ettiel... :-)

Yes, I have sent off some information, hopefully I shall learn more very soon...

Best wishes for you also...

Steve. 8-)

DJK12 profile image
DJK12

Steve - opening your post this morning in the UK quite made my day. Very exciting news and although clinical trials are yet to start it is such progess and just uplifting that someone is doing this research. I know 2nd generation drugs following on Ruxolitinib are in the offing but side effects are still an issue. Thank you for posting. Best wishes Diana

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to DJK12

Hey Diana... :-)

Thanks for your response...

Yes, there may still be a few wrinkles that require finessing...

However, when I was Dx in 2016, there was talk about the theory of being able to achieve this result. That now, and only Six (6) years later... Great promise appears to be on the event horizon, (fingers crossed of course)... 8-)

Stay happy, safe & well...

Steve

hunter5582 profile image
hunter5582

Finding a protein difference at the exterior of mutated HSCs is huge in developing new treatments. The CALR mutation is the only MPN driver mutation that appears to have a detectable difference at the level of the cell wall. Hopefully a detectable difference for JAK2 and MPL will be found someday.

This sounds like very promising option for treating MF and potentially other MPNs.

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to hunter5582

Cheers Steve... 8-)

Yes, there has been some JAK2 tests but they're still working on further developments at the present...

Looks a promising event for CALR all the same. I do recall seeing these theories in much earlier discussions over 5 years ago... Hopefully, I will manage to join the Trials in due course as well...

Will keep you Posted.

Best wishes Steve

Steve

FAM_KT profile image
FAM_KT

My Husband told me about this a few weeks ago after researching - he is an Aussie - we are based in the UK - but this is the first time I have actually seen the article myself, thank you for posting - it is very promising and I really hope they receive the funding they need - he did lead me to believe that they were already in trials maybe he was mistaken and that is was not for just CALR mutations - I will be very interested to see how this turns out for those with the CALR mutation if the prove it to be safe to trial on people - like hunter said hopefully someday the JAX2 and MPL may be found someday!

But still absolutely brilliant news for the MPNs!

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to FAM_KT

Yes, all very promising, & mainly Phase II & III Trials are what I believe they are trying to raise the funding for at present...

Thus far, CALR is the Driver mutation that shows the greatest potential. However, this type of research has the capacity to unlock many other avenues...

Stay tuned...

Best wishes

Steve

Meatloaf9 profile image
Meatloaf9

Thank you for posting. This is great news, who knows where it will lead and what other mpn's may be affected some day, hopefully sooner rather than later. Thanks and hope you are doing well.

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to Meatloaf9

Cheers... :-)

Will keep all of you Posted of course as things continue to develop...

Best wishes all... 8-)

Steve

EPguy profile image
EPguy

Neat report. They note it was active on both type 1 and type 2 CALR. As Hunter notes, the immune therapies are so far limited to CALR since Jak2 for example does not make itself visible to the treatments.

<<Importantly, 4D7 inhibited proliferation of patient samples with both insertion and deletion CALR mutations (types 1 and 2) but not JAK2 V617F >>

This study was preclinical, and they seem to propose CAR-T is one way to implement it in clinical future. The magic agent seems to be "clone 4D7" and they feel good about its promise.

<<It will be intriguing to test anti‐CALR monoclonal antibody efficacy in the setting of macrophage activation or CAR T‐cell therapies.>>

One published version of it:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

--

In a short talk from Dr Mesa and Dr K on a different immunizing concept, there was not brilliant results in a small Danish clinical study. I think it had good pre-clinical results. But it uses a very different method from the top report here.

"CALR directed vaccine trial"

<<CALR mutation is expressed on the surface of the cells>>

<<sequential injections of the vaccine, they could induce some immune response but unfortunately until now, no clinical response>>

Activated T-cells (a desired result) could not enter the marrow, so no benefit.

This trial used "peptide CALRLong36 derived from the CALR exon 9", which is apparently very different from the one used in the top study here.

Dr Mesa notes that lots of other work is ongoing to improve on this (eg the top report here) Implication is the are other ways to do this beyond "CALRLong36" this trial used (eg clone 47 above).

vjhemonc.com/event/mpn-sess...

Here is the study they are discussing:

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/337...

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8

Thanks for your input here... & while all of that is a part of this story, nevertheless, this version still suggests promise, and I for one am happy to enter such a Trial...

Yes, the CAR T cell therapies have been mentioned, however, the article is really more about CALR therapies & possibilities per se

Mainly because the CALR mutation is different in its structure:

"Calreticulin (CALR) is a highly conserved multifunctional chaperone protein primarily present in the endoplasmic reticulum, where it regulates Ca2+ homeostasis. Recently, CALR has gained special interest for its diverse functions outside the endoplasmic reticulum, including the cell surface and extracellular space" (Čiplysa et al 2022)

Mainly because the chaperone sits outside the cell ER, is why such therapies seem possible for CALR mutations, and therefore what limits them too at present to CALR mutations...

However, as long as things, (research on MPNs), continues to increase w/ intensity, more & more therapies will ultimately emerge simply from the momentum, in my view...

Cheers

Steve

Reference

Čiplysa et al 2022. " Mapping human calreticulin regions important for structural stability"

doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.20...

EPguy profile image
EPguy in reply to socrates_8

Agree this version points to great promise. The two stories show how details within the new immune therapy can make such a difference.

I think CALR has a path to a cure, since there is now a concept to get there. I think CAR-T is just one of the several paths available, but interesting to know that CAR-T is not the only way to do it.

Jak2 will likely require a different concept. INF is known to "uncloak" the allele to the immune system so it could be INF + these types of immune therapies could be worthy against Jak2.

JP1952 profile image
JP1952

Thank you for posting. Brilliant news.

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to JP1952

Love ALL positive news... 8-)

S

champ30 profile image
champ30

This is fantastic news Steve for those with CALR mutation.Thanks for sharing.

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8

It may prove to be a break through for many, in time...

Great news... 8-)

S

CraftySpider profile image
CraftySpider

Thanks for that really interesting and hopeful news..just wish clinical trials / licences etc could go a bit quicker !

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to CraftySpider

Funding is often the real issue, as running Trials can be very expensive, as I understand it...

However, I couldn't agree w/ you more... Hopefully, more promising news to follow shortly...

Best

Steve

dbus1417 profile image
dbus1417

This has made my week! I hope they will allow its use for CALR ET as well in the future. Nip it in the bud so to speak. 🤙 from Texas

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to dbus1417

My understanding thus far is that the magical clone cell (4D7), once employed, would prevent further proliferation of unwanted mutated cells, (whether in MF, ET or PV). However, the fibrosis caused through bone marrow scarring , (meaning the damage already in-situ), may not correct itself(?) I suppose, the longer the damage has been untreated the greater the ill effects(?) But who knows about the magical healing wonders of our human anatomy?

Nevertheless, for all intensive purposes this might still prove to be a "cure"?

Fingers crossed... :-)

Best wishes...

Steve

EPguy profile image
EPguy in reply to socrates_8

4D7 may be less targeted for PV since this study was designed to target CALR, and CALR is not known in PV from what I've read. I think its lack of effect on Jak2 was presented as a good thing for the purpose of showing its specific action to CALR.

But if it can help for PV too that is extra neat.

For marrow fibrosis, INF can reverse it in some cases, including early low risk MF. See image here. I just posted about this presentation.

lls.org/sites/default/files...

So such repair can happen, and 4D7 may have the same ability. Could be once the irritant is removed by various ways, the bone can heal. INF takes years to improve marrow, if it does at all. 4D7 might do it way faster.

Fibrosis reversion
socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply to EPguy

Hey again... :-)

Yes, quite correct too that you remind me about CALR usually never present in PV. However, sometimes an ET Dx becomes PV and vice-versa... (?) In any event, you are quite right to point it out of course... My BAD! Apologies...

My understanding is that there are cases where INF has shown molecular reversal, however, it will be of interest to discover whether or not 4D7 actually does the same thing(?) Jury's still out at this early stage...

Cheers again

Steve

EPguy profile image
EPguy in reply to socrates_8

You're right on the INF molec reversal. Here is the plot I've often posted from the Besremi study at 5 years. Median allele (MR) is greatly reduced, while HU had no long term MR. But it's for Jak2, and other reports have indicated marrow histology (BMR) is not well predicted by MR.

I'd guess that if 4D7 works, it would help MR and BMR since it gets to the real source. But it's a long ways to know any of that for this particular agent. They also said they are working on a better one, maybe they'll call it 4D8...

On ET-PV-ET I suspect these are Jak2 phenotypes. But there is always a new study finding surprises.

Ropeg5+Years
AndyKay profile image
AndyKay

Thank you. This is amazing and I sure hope it all goes well with the trials.

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8

Hey Andy... :-)

Thanks... First, I have to manage to get into the Trials... However, I have reached out & we shall see what transpires in due course I guess...

Best wishes... :-)

Steve

You may also like...

Myelofibrosis and fedratinib

needing a bit of a moan. I've had high risk MF now for many years. Last year I was assessed for STC...

myelofibrosis and interferon

ET (MPL EXON10) in Nov 2019. I progressed to Myelofibrosis in March 2021. I was put onto...

Myelofibrosis and nausea

everyone. I was diagnosed with Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis 3 years ago and current take asprin and...

HU Resistance/Intolerance Prognostic from Dr Gotlib

ms/emerging-research/experts-explain-mdm2-inhibition-and-clinical-trial-for-mpn-patients -- It...

Myelofibrosis and platelets