Is this normal

[Anaonymous888]

I’m circumcised and don’t know if the extra tissue is normal.

[Hidden]

Normal is hard to pinpoint when every guy is different and every doctor does things just a little differently than the other You appear to have a nicely circumcised penis with a “looser” cut. Looks fine to me.

[Clay237 in reply to Hidden]

I concur

[John12123]

How long has it been now?

[Anaonymous888 in reply to John12123]

Like 15 years...

[Hidden]

Yeah its normal. Welcome to the cut club mate, here guys don't have foreskin and proud of it. 💪💪🤣🤣

[Anaonymous888 in reply to Hidden]

I got it when i was born though

[Anaonymous888 in reply to Hidden]

I’m Jewish so i got it young

[Hidden in reply to Anaonymous888]

Wow, that a routine cut. But I did the choice for me bro.

[Circedandlovingit]

It looks good. What happens to the extra skin when it's erect?

[Anaonymous888 in reply to Circedandlovingit]

It evens out mostly and looks normal when erect but there is still a little bit of ‘tissue’ there just not as prominent.

[Circedandlovingit in reply to Anaonymous888]

You could post a picture of erect and see what everyone thinks. If the extra skin is bothering you, talk with your GP about it.

[jimfromfresno]

Well, since circumcision is not normal, anything is just part of the deal.

[At1012 in reply to jimfromfresno]

Notice that a remnant of the ridge band remains. Very interesting. This appears to be the biblical circumcision, which would be a circumcised foreskin. This would give the appearance of an unmitigated dick. Notice that all smooth mucosa was left intact. Also forcible retraction does not appear to have taken place. The mohel just pulled at the tip of foreskin at the north/south location, followed by cutting off the overhang. What do you think?

[At1012]

Wow, that is a very lose cut. You can see a remnant of the ridge band, this means that you were left with most likely all the smooth mucosa. You appear to have the biblical circumcision, which is a circumcised foreskin. Do you remember if your glans was always exposed?

[At1012]

It’s done at 8 days old. Also this appears to be the biblical circumcision because the inner skin was completely preserved combined with a remnant of the ridge band. Pulling at the tip at the front of glans followed by cutting off the overhang. What do you think? You can definitely tell that the foreskin was never forcibly retracted. Have you seen other jewish circumcisions that look this loose?