I saw my rheumy today and have at last got a definite diagnosis. It IS lupus but he told me it is mild in my case. I take 400mg hydroxy and have done so since November last year and it has really helped enormously but I keep getting pleurisy and episcleritis which my gp has treated with a 5 day course of 30 mg steroids which worked. But i told him it is always "grumbling" still. He told me he was loath to put me on long term steroids (which I'm pleased about) and said I had the option of either colchicine or azathioprine to add to the mix to further keep things under control. I queried aza as thought better to keep the "big guns" for later if needed, because I thought it was progressive ie would get worse over time (?) He said pattern of lupus is that it's normally set in 1st 5 years but since I've only had symptoms 2 years we couldn't say with me. (???) So I opted for colchicine rather than aza and hope I made the right choice!
My question I suppose is whether in your experience, things experienced in the 1st 5 years DO remain in the same pattern, or if in fact they do progress over time. And... is it like RA where hard treatment early helps matters, or not. In other words, is taking aza early beneficial, or best left for later if needed.
I do hope this makes sense!
Many thanks. C