I have eventually found a a lymph drainage therapist, having not had any MLD for over a year due to my usual therapist retiring and the various lockdowns. I have always had Vodder treatment previously, with an hour's massage starting at the neck. When I saw my new therapist yesterday she said she followed the Leduc method as it's better supported by the evidence. It involved me using a ball under my armpit and knees at various times to stimulate lymph flow and she only did a bit of massage on one leg and foot and lower stomach. I had come to her because my leg still hasn't recovered from the flu jab a month ago (see previous post). It felt very different from Vodder as the whole body wasn't treated.
I haven't heard of Leduc before and though I've looked on the net there doesn't seem to be much about it. Any experiences or views would be really appreciated. Thanks
Has she trained with the Lymphoedema Training Academy? If so, it is a form of MLD, but not Vodder, which is why you noticed the difference in technique. Therapists from this school might not treat whole body. Check the LTA website to see if she is registered with them. She may also be registered with MLDUK and The BLS.
Thanks, Lynora. Yes, she is registered with LTA and MLDUK and seems well-qualified. I was hoping that my post would generate replies from people who had experienced both therapies or at least an opinion / information about Leduc. She said it was better supported by the evidence than Vodder but I would have liked another opinion on it.