Notifaction issues

[bexx87]

Is any one else having issues viewing their notifications (aka getting spinning wheel of death) ir is it just because im on my kindle/phone and not a full browser and is having (like me) a blimpy moment ? It was fine like 10 mins ago its highly annoying as i cant see what recent notifactions i have (and i need to sort out my auto correcta on my keyboard kindle but thats a offline issue i should get a new one)

How do i clear (muito <--- Spanish auto correct pain i typed my) my browser cache on this thing !!

Ooo this kindle has a desktop browser version still learning things (thtows juniores auto correct again throws kindle across the room i think it doesnt like me speed touch typing) about this "types annoyingly -los no ssslllooowww" i give up

Desktop browser version is also having issues reloading

"Fights with page scrolling and more auto correct"

Screams and swears in frustration at screen

Smacks screen owww that hurt my hand

Ive gotten my lazy bum out of bed as Ive been in it all day to load up my pc as it was annoying to me to see if a full pc browser has the same issue and it looks like its only on google chrome as thats what my android and pc use but I use loaded firefox to check if it was a compatible issue and notification in firefox loaded fine

Top is google chrome view and bottom is mozilla firefox version and dont even try to load it in internet explore

ahhh no firefox wont load now .... why why whhhhhhhhy and I utterly refuse refuse to use the evil that is any thing apple related *hisses*

I swear there are gremlins in the web broswers tonight I just loaded my bank web page and got a web page that said things like

retail_credentails_public_login_subtitle in chrome, loaded it in firefox, it momentarily displayed the same as chrome but reverted to the normal page

[brumatmed]

WARNING

***This is not to be read by anyone who has Cyberphobia***

Woah there Bex, it looks like the IT fairy is looking for milk and cookies before it works properly for you. (Fave phrase when thinking or working requires the assistance of IT - Aaaand Reeelaxxxxx) the main reason is this annoys computers (as an entity) because they cannot fulfil their primary purpose of winding the user (us) up.

We all know that computers were created by humans to make our lives easier, in the same way that robots were, and yet they have both spawned massive entertainment industries of films where the computers and robots 'take out the middleman', by realising that humans are both weak and inefficient (which is true) however the human vision of the future of destruction and general Orwellian 'bad times await us all' is seen from a creator point of view. Following the computer/ robot seeing the human weak and inefficient it follows that the computer or robot would not waste their own resources to kill off the humans as it is far more efficient to let the humans do that themselves.

The above paragraph explains why there will never be an overt war with the robots, however, I am sure that robots and computers like to carry out psychological tests on us based on the information we have given them (strength of key stroke = the more determined/ harder a key is pressed could indicate how cross the user is - primary/ secondary/ tertiary languages - how far can the computer go in 'winding the user up' and so on) bizarrely, computers can only 'wind us up' as they become 'self aware' of both their limitations and abilities - these skills are taught to the computer by the programmer.

As long as we remember that computers want to experiment (psychologically) as opposed to kill us, we will be fine. And if we can relax when using them, they cannot fulfil the primary winding up/ experimentation purpose, which means we are masters over the machines.

***Insert suitable manic laughter where you feel suitable***

[bexx87 in reply to brumatmed]

that was a far to long winded explanation to your just over reacting due to lack of sleep ....

[brumatmed in reply to bexx87]

Probably, but it was fun (and some may even say funky)

[bexx87 in reply to brumatmed]

For you maybe