Hi, first post on this forum, new to all of this.
On a recent trip to the opticians, my wife (56) was referred to our local eye clinic with narrow drainage angles. Her ocular pressure is ok and there are no other abnormalities.
The referral was quick and she had an appointment at the clinic within a few weeks. After the prerequisite tests, she was seen and examined by the specialist ophthalmologist. Again, no specific abnormalities but she has narrow angles - how narrow was an unknown at this point.
Now, this is where it gets tricky. Is my wife a primary angle closure suspect? She has no other risk factors. Apparently, pre Covid, they would have recommended a laser peripheral iridotomy. However, the NICE guidelines have changed following the Singapore ANA LIS Trial. The overall risk of progression from narrow angles to primary angle closure is low. The initial prognosis was to leave it and just monitor the situation.
He elected to conduct one final ‘scan’ taking a complete image of the eyes - front to back. This was then discussed with the consultant ophthalmologist. Following the review with the consultant, he then pulled up data from the Singapore study. He pointed out that some my wife’s scan stats were lower than the 3rd group in the study indicating she has narrow, narrow angles or very narrow. Given this information, the recommendation was changed and a prophylactic laser iridotomy should be conducted.
Gauging individual risk is difficult. Has anyone else encountered this situation? My wife is squeamish about her eyes and doesn’t relish the treatment unless it is necessary.
Thanks