New paper below [1].
Michael Schweizer is not as well-known as Samuel Denmeade to those interested in BAT. Here he is speaking to Alicia Morgans a year ago.
urotoday.com/video-lectures...
From a more recent discussion between Charles Ryan & Emmanuel Antonarakis [2]:
Charles Ryan: I mean, you're basically taking... if I can use the term, the evolutionary biology of prostate cancer and just reverting it, because what you are saying is all of the progression and death from prostate cancer is because we starve, starve, starve the testosterone, the androgens, and cancer evolves, whether it's neuroendocrine or p53 emerges, et cetera. And you're just saying, "Don't give them that opportunity or revert that." In a way, it's almost convincing the cells that they are happy with the testosterone on board and they won't progress to these lineage plasticity-type events.
Emmanuel Antonarakis: Yeah. That's-
Charles Ryan: That's a paradox.
Emmanuel Antonarakis: That's the hypothesis. I just want to mention two other things so we can put a plug in for our fellows who became faculty members. We had a fellow, Michael Schweizer, who is, of course now at the University of Washington in Seattle. Dr. Schweizer has done a study, it's been presented at ESMO but not yet published; a single-arm study, no control group, where patients got bipolar androgen therapy plus the PARP inhibitor, olaparib.In that study, the combination of BAT plus olaparib produced a PFS, a radiographic PFS that was more than 12 months, which was longer than we had previously seen with BAT monotherapy. Now, this was not a controlled study with a control group, but that 12 plus month PFS was very intriguing. I have not yet seen the breakdown by HRR status because, in that trial, he allowed both the HRR deficient and proficient, but you may have your own hypothesis.
More Schweizer: [3].
***
It's strange that the cohort that had no DNA defects did as well as the cohort that did. Perhaps that indicates that supraphysiological T really does induce double-strand DNA breaks?
I wish that someone would compare the effect of T at 2,000 ng/dL versus the normal-high of 1,000 ng/dL.
From the paper:
"Results: Thirty-six patients enrolled and 6 discontinued prior to response assessment. In the ITT cohort, PSA50 response rate at 12-weeks was 11/36 (31%...), and 16/36 (44%...) had a PSA50 response at any time on-study. After a median follow-up of 19 months, the median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival in the ITT cohort was 13.0 months (95% CI 7-17). Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of HRR gene mutational status.
"Conclusions: BAT plus olaparib is associated with high response rates and long PFS {progression-free survival} Clinical benefit was observed regardless of HRR gene mutational status."
-Patrick
[1] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/365...