Dr. Denmeade concluded his presentation with the following key takeaways:
The presence of AR alterations in ctDNA may identify patients who may or may not benefit from BAT
In this study patients with no AR alterations treated with BAT exhibit significantly shorter PFS and OS compared to those treated with Enzalutamide
Additional clinical trials with BAT are open and actively accruing:
STEP-UP (sequencing BAT and Enzalutamide)
APEX (sequencing BAT + Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) with Enzalutamide)
BATRAD (BAT + 223 Radium)
AcroBAT (oral testosterone)
However, patients with AR alterations treated with BAT trend toward prolonged PFS and OS vs. Enzalutamide, although not significant: PFS (p=0.22), OS (p=0.058)