Looked into several years ago and found that procedure was originally created and used for stopping air leaks after LVR. Trial studies weighed the pros and cons and did not approve. Then the powers that be came up with a new use. Place several valves in the lungs to redirect air flow. The possible side effects and a 30% danger rate for infections, etc, convinced me not worth the risks involved.
I empathize with you. I am 75 and seems the only alternatives to LVR are too risky. I stop researching valve placement a couple of years ago. Regardless of the different medical valves they all had the same high risks problems. Piercing the lung if valve dislodges. 30% rate of infections and/or pneumonia, etc. With the valve the patient's private insurance must pay all medial costs associated with the known and projected issues.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.