TP53 gives competitive advantage in low dose B... - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,337 members40,045 posts

TP53 gives competitive advantage in low dose BCL2 inhibitor treatment

PulsedTherapy profile image
5 Replies

ashpublications.org/blood/a...

Anyone else see this paper on TP53. Looks like a very well done study. It's mainly for AML, but should have carryover to CLL.

What they found was that if you don't have enough BCL2 inhibitor kill the TP53 clonal population, it will become dominant, as the TP53 mutation gives it survival advantages even though it is upstream of BCL2.

They theorizing by regulating BAK/BKT downstream of BCL2.

The argue that this competitive survival advantage of the TP53 is the reason why we see shorter PFS for TP53 patients.

Also, very interestingly, if they used BCL2 inhibitor plus MCL1, the effectiveness was nearly complete.

I haven't seen an BCL2/MCL1 trial yet, but sounds like it would be an excellent one to do.

Written by
PulsedTherapy profile image
PulsedTherapy
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
5 Replies
PulsedTherapy profile image
PulsedTherapy

Looks like there is a trial on the MCL1 alone and with venetoclax, but I didn't see results:

clinicaltrials.gov/study/NC...

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilPartnerAdministrator in reply toPulsedTherapy

That's a phase 1 study where the effectiveness of the drug and its toxicity are evaluated by researchers for different blood cancers. Only 70 patients registered and there's no patient number breakdown by the AML, CLL and MDS categories included. Looks like they decided not to pursue CLL or MM per my emphasis and concentrated on AML; "Part 1 of the study is monotherapy dose escalation. Closed November 2020 Part 2 of the study is monotherapy expansion groups for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), AML/ myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and multiple myeloma (MM). Closed November 2020 Part 3 is a sequential, dose-escalation study of the combination of AZD5991 and venetoclax in subjects with relapsed/refractory AML."

Note the referenced study that initiated this clinical trial phase 1 research; Discovery of Mcl-1-specific inhibitor AZD5991 and preclinical activity in multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/305...

That fits with what was noted in table 1 of the roughly concurrently written paper I referenced earlier.

Neil

PulsedTherapy profile image
PulsedTherapy in reply toAussieNeil

Roger that, I did read elsehwere while investigating this, MCL1 overexpression does seem to happen in TP53 relapse. So maybe an application there.

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilPartnerAdministrator

"CLL cells in all patients express high levels of BCL2 and typically much lower levels of MCL1 or BCLxL", which is why MCL1 inhibitors aren't used for CLL treatment, per table 1, BCL2-targeting or MCL1-targeting bone fide BH3 mimetics currently in clinical trials

From BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors for hematologic malignancies (2021)

ashpublications.org/blood/a...

The authors are from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, where BCL-2 research that resulted in the development of venetoclax began in the late 1990s, plus associated Australian CLL centres of excellence.

You need to be very careful about extrapolating myeloid neoplasm research to lymphoid neoplasm research. More importantly in this case, MCL1 expression varies with the maturity stage of B cell neoplasms, which is why it is used in clinical trials for multiple myeloma (MM), a mature B cell (plasma cell) neoplasm, but not CLL.

Neil

PulsedTherapy profile image
PulsedTherapy in reply toAussieNeil

Great explanation, thanks AussieNeil

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

EHA 2022: Outcomes Following Treatment With a Covalent BTK and BCL2 Inhibitor

https://cllsociety.org/2022/08/eha-2022-outcomes-following-treatment-with-a-covalent-btk-and-bcl2-in

BTK Degrader Shows Potential for Treating Refractory CLL and SLL

A novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) degrader, NX-2127, has shown potential for treating patients...
Jm954 profile image
Administrator

Australian current treatment legislation

Is it correct that in Australia currently for a SLL /CLL patient, if you are NOT 17p del but still...
Waves01 profile image

Response and Survival Rates for FCR and Ibrutinib

Those of you who waded through my post yesterday on clonal evolution will be glad to know this is a...
AdrianUK profile image

On a break from Ibrutinib

I stopped taking Ibrutinib in February 2024. After five and a half years the side effects got the...
Beattiem-UK profile image

Moderation team

See all
Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator
Newdawn profile image
NewdawnAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.