New test detects COVID accurately, within hour... - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,335 members40,042 posts

New test detects COVID accurately, within hours of infection

bennevisplace profile image
5 Replies

simonsfoundation.org/2023/0...

SNIP, with my emphasis \\

Most existing COVID-19 tests “rely on the same principle, which is that you have accumulated a detectable amount of viral material, for example, in your nose,” says study lead author Frank Zhang, who worked on the project as a Flatiron research fellow at the Flatiron Institute’s Center for Computational Biology (CCB) in New York City. “That poses a challenge when it’s early in the infection time window and you haven’t accumulated a lot of viral material, or you’re asymptomatic.”

The new technique is instead based on how our bodies mount an immune response when invaded by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. When the assault starts, specific genes turn on. Segments of those genes produce mRNA molecules that guide the building of proteins. The particular blend of those mRNA molecules changes the types of proteins produced, including proteins involved in virus-fighting functions. The new method can confidently identify when the body is mounting an immune response to the COVID-19 virus by measuring the relative abundance of the various mRNA molecules. The new study is the first to use such an approach to diagnose an infectious disease.

\\

When put to the test using real-world blood samples, the new method yielded an impressive 98.4 percent accuracy rating. That’s especially impressive as the approach works just as well on asymptomatic patients, for whom rapid antigen tests can be less than 60 percent accurate.

\\

The new approach isn’t ready for prime time yet, Zhang says. He and his colleagues only tested blood samples rather than the nasal samples that are more common and convenient for diagnosing COVID-19. Also, they need to make sure they can distinguish between the body’s reaction to COVID-19 and its response to infections caused by other viruses, such as colds.

\\

Not ready yet, but if this approach can adapt to a more workable format i.e. nasal swabs (finger prick blood samples?) it would provide the means to detect many more potential COVID spreaders than has been possible with current testing methods. And presumably the same technique could be used in the management of viral outbreaks in the future.

Written by
bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
5 Replies
CLLerinOz profile image
CLLerinOzAdministrator

I like the sound of 'near-perfect accuracy' and 'within hours of infection'. As you say, it still needs to be translated into a more workable format but it sounds promising.

Caltech research conducted in the laboratory of Niles Pierce is looking at better ways to detect the virus using a rapid home test by utilizing "a technology called hybridization chain reaction (HCR), which boosts the signal of the reporter molecules. With the new test, every viral protein captured then grows a long tail of DNA. This DNA does not encode for anything biological but rather acts as a specially designed scaffold upon which many colorful reporter molecules can attach. In this way, each viral particle emits a much “brighter” signal. In a skillful engineering process, the team designed the amplified test so that each step occurs sequentially in a disposable device about the size of a playing card without user intervention."

There's more information about it here: healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo...

It's encouraging to see the progress that's being made with testing methods.

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace in reply toCLLerinOz

Thanks for that Oz. In the wide ranging post you referenced I"m afraid I couldn't locate the bit about the Caltech research, which I would like to read.

CLLerinOz profile image
CLLerinOzAdministrator in reply tobennevisplace

I thought the URL I provided would have taken you to the reply in that post that included the links to the Caltech research but, as that doesn't seem to have worked, here are the direct links:

caltech.edu/about/news/at-h...

pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac...

😀 CLLerinOz

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace in reply toCLLerinOz

Thanks! This technology is virtually there, apart from a tweak or two and scaling up. Very promising.

Fran57 profile image
Fran57

Sounds promising!

Thank you, Fran 😉

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T

We evaluated 254 COVID-19 patients longitudinally from early infection and for eight months...
zaax profile image

Living in the USA with CLL and want to know where to sign up for your COVID-19 Vaccination? A State-by-State List

From MedPage Today: Every state has posted information on its plan; many (though not all) list...
AussieNeil profile image
Partner

Coronavirus spreading from surfaces is not the main way we can become infected. Plus shopping tips to keep you safe at the supermarket

The US Centers for Disease Control has recently updated their How COVID spreads information,...
AussieNeil profile image
Partner

The promise of Mix and Match COVID-19 vaccinations

A couple of papers published in Nature provide some encouraging indications of why a 'mix and...
AussieNeil profile image
Partner

Vaccines – at what point do they become a disbenefit?

I need to state out front that I’m not anti vaccination, I believe in the benefits having had...
IWVC profile image