Venetoclax -> Ibrutinib: I am new here and write... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,769 members39,067 posts

Venetoclax -> Ibrutinib

artkula profile image
3 Replies

I am new here and write on behalf of my father. He is 62 y/o and was diagnosed with CLL 1.5 year ago. He received BR treatment and experienced an early relapsed with del17p/Tp53. He could not afford Ibrutinib but got enrolled into a 2-year Venetoclax trial. Meanwhile, we are seeking opportunities to get Ibrutinib which is less expensive than Venetoclax. Hopefully, by the end of this 2-year period, he could get it. I saw many people describing the transition from Ibrutinib to Venetoclax and I wonder if anyone underwent an opposite transition, namely, from Venetoclax to Ibrutinib. I would appreciate if you could share your experience.

Best wishes to everyone of you!

Written by
artkula profile image
artkula
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
Hoffy profile image
Hoffy

I am on a ibruvica + Venetoclax trial, From what I can tell Venetoclax is stronger than Imbruvica. With 17P Deletion it is best to stay on Venetoclax if you can in my opinion. Maybe special funding could be given by the drug company or others some how,

Hoffy

artkula profile image
artkula in reply to Hoffy

Thank you for the response, Hoffy. I hope the trial procedure will bring the best result to you.

We received conflicting statements from the doctors, one saying Imbruvica is still the best choice as a first treatment another saying that as Ibrutinib uses a different pathway, it should still work after Venetoclax and 17p deletion alone is not a major predictor of an outcome with these drugs. Things like having or not having complex karyotype, Richter transformation or Fludarabine-refractory CLL serve as better predictors.

I wonder when you tell stronger, do you mean side-effects or efficiency? From what I read, the dropout rate for Imbruvica due to side effects is greater than that with Venetoclax. That is where Acalabrutinib is a new hope since it uses the same pathway as Ibrutinib but has fewer adverse inhibitions and thus expected to yield fewer side-effects.

Hoffy profile image
Hoffy in reply to artkula

Venetoclax is strong from an efficacy standpoint. And Side effects appear to be less. One can always start on Ibruvica or ACP-196 and move to Venetoclax later. It is unknow what is better - starting as a combo or waiting til one does not work and moving to the next drug. Both are good drugs and much better in my opinion than traditional Chemo therapy.

Be Well,

Hoffy

You may also like...

Ibrutinib / Venetoclax

occasional night sweats he offered me a trial drug Ibrutinib/Venetoclax starting in June. I thought...

Combination therapy with Ibrutinib and Venetoclax?

can get the combination of Ibrutinib and Venetoclax without being in a trial? We live in the US (...

Ibrutinib V Venetoclax + Rituximab

I had FCR treatment for CLL about 6 years ago but a number of lymph nodes now getting lumpy. I am...

Ibrutinib and Obinutuzumab with Venetoclax

treatment for CLL as soon as possible. He was given info. about the clinical trial which adds...

Venetoclax and ibrutinib trial

Hello, I’m on month 19 of a 26 month trial taking Venetoclax & ibrutinib plus aciclovir,...