I had a fibroscan a few months ago and results were 8.2 which I understand.
Had lft etc a couple of weeks ago and the results are all normal. However I am unable to have another fibroscan for 2-3 years.
Is this the norm? I wondered if there was any chance the fibroscan result could have improved given lft (alt,ast,ggt 20 or below) improvement but looks like I’ve got to wait quite a while...
Written by
namll
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Hi namil I was a 21 f4 but with no alcohol and healthy diet no fat a year later went to an 8 f2. They will still monitor me but not so often because my liver is not in danger on an 8. So stop any alcohol and no fat and your liver should be fine.
You could pay for another fibroscan but if they’re saying 2-3 years it’s probably because you’re not in danger. You should have ultra sounds every 6 months to look for lumps and bumps and measure the organs
I had to ask for another ultrasound, which will probably be in 2 to 3 months time, I’m not sure it would have been offered otherwise.
I was told at time of initial scan that I had some long term liver damage (that’s what result reading showed it seems, along with bloods) but then told when getting blood results this time that it can improve (pretty sure said reversible) which I find difficult to understand - to me long term damage doesn’t sound reversible!
I think I’m going to try and see where fibroscans are available privately and pay for one (although I still may not like result at least I won’t be worrying for a couple of years whilst waiting).
Did your doctor suggest a no fat diet? It is my understanding that sugar not fat is harmful to the liver? and fat is only harmful if from processed foods like artificial trans fat.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.