So after my weekend run and watching the athletics I sat down with a spreadsheet. Sounds crazy but I started looking at pace based upon stride length and cadence. My usual stride length is around 85cm with a recently improved cadence of around 165 (This gives 7:07/km)
What I found interesting was that a small increase in stride length could have a significant difference on overall pace when the cadence was kept the same. Was this the secret sauce.
Watching the athletes you cannot help but notice how smooth their running is yet how fast they are going. Watching their strides they clearly have much longer strides than me, but the key is not reaching out in front of them but rather pushing off and reaching out behind them.
[Note : reaching out in front is a bad idea as it puts a lot of weight onto your knees and slows you down because you are effectively braking in every step]
So armed with this information I headed out this morning on what was meant to be a steady paced run.
Itching to give it a go I started off with a gentle cadence, I had set my watch to keep an eye on pace, cadence and stride length.
I found that it was tough pushing off even just that little bit. Normally I plod and this extra exertion was something I was going to have to practice!
After 4k of gentle running at the end of a looped run with 1k to home I decided to see how I would fair giving my theory a proper test to see if I could run the remaining 1k home with 165 cadence and 1m stride (6:03/km). What resulted was a 170 cadence and 1.04m stride length resulting in a new 1k PB of 5:32.
I was delighted. Could I run a whole 5k like this - NO (not yet).
Clearly there is a difference in exertion when pushing forward to increase stride vs my usual bounding running style. I will have to work on this and see where it takes me.
In the meantime, happy running everyone.