Sans gps run

[Decker]

Slow off the mark today. Was cold and overcast. I also am almost out of data on my phone, so I had to run without the gps Fitbit app that sucks data like no tomorrow. So it was back to the old start and stop the watch method. This method must track very differently because my pace jumped from 7min/km to 5.5!! And the run felt about the same. Weird. Overall a bit cool, but still a decent run. Am seriously now looking at a Garmin with built in gps.

[Oldfloss Administrator 60minGraduate]

Garmin .. great.... Blimey you are running fast !

[Decker in reply to Oldfloss]

Yes I think its time to switch to a Garmin finally! I think my real pace is closer to 7, not 5.5, since the gps tracking is more accurate 🙂 Who knows, the Garmin may even show a slower pace!

[Oldfloss Administrator 60minGraduate in reply to Decker]

My comfy pace is 7.30... but then I am an old snail!

[Decker in reply to Oldfloss]

Not sure about that Floss - on the last GPS run, I had to work hard to break past 7.30 zone towards the 6 zone and was fully out of breath at the end :).

[Oldfloss Administrator 60minGraduate in reply to Decker]

It is weird.. I did a 3.5K today and my timings per K were all over the place! Mind, I did decide to do a hill for the first K...not a good idea!!

[Bluebirdrunner Graduate10 in reply to Oldfloss]

Well done Floss...that 3.5k is a tricky little run after the 7k isn't it..without hills playing a part. xx

[Oldfloss Administrator 60minGraduate in reply to Bluebirdrunner]

It is.. and it felt so much further... I was a bit tired!

[Decker in reply to Oldfloss]

Haha, yes that why I stay away from the hills 😀

[pollyp1 Graduate10 in reply to Oldfloss]

I'm working towards a comfy pace of 7.30, speedy!

[Mummycav Administrator Graduate10]

Still a good run my friend 😉

[Decker in reply to Mummycav]

It was ok. They can’t all be gems 🙃

[SaskAlliecat Graduate10]

I enjoy my garmin. It's nice to be able to take a quick peak and see my distance/pace or distance/time depending what I have my screen set to. It is also easy to change screens on the fly. I usually still run with my phone because I love love love running to music but I tuck my phone in my flip belt and not pull it out until the end of the run.

[Decker in reply to SaskAlliecat]

Thats exactly what Im looking for. I like just having my phone fir the tunes too. And the Garmins seem to have the large digits that are easier to read than my old fitbit charge with its tiny screen. What model do you have Sask?

[SaskAlliecat Graduate10 in reply to Decker]

I have the forerunner 10; It doesn't have a heart rate monitor but it fit my budget when I bought it a few years ago. I'm not that concerned about training within a target heart rate. It tells me distance, pace, time and can set a pace alarm or run/walk intervals if I choose. It tells me the pace of every km (lap) ran at the end of the run. If I download the info to garmin connect, I can get the map and stats of elevation etc. It's a base model, but works well for what I need. I'm not sure if this model is still available anymore though.

[Decker in reply to SaskAlliecat]

Thanks - Yes that sounds pretty cool. I like the pace alarm feature too. If I have time I will check it out tomorrow. I'm looking at the VIVOACTIVE model now which is $100 off for a short time.

[SaskAlliecat Graduate10 in reply to Decker]

When I was shopping the vivoactive was definitely on my list as well. I can't remember why forerunner won out, I think my budget at the time probably played a big role. Happy shopping 😁

[Decker in reply to SaskAlliecat]

Yep I would not be considering it either if not for the $100 sale which was a nice surprise.

[Bazza1234 Graduate10]

I used RUNKEEPER on my Android phone for a LONG time - before I got a Garmin FR220. I got the Garmin because I really wanted to do some HR training and run within certain HR limits and no Android App would do that. Having said that I am very happy with the Garmin and after doing lots of HR training I could finally run within certain pace bands to much the same effect as HR training. BUT - now that I am not running, I am finding that I am reverting back to using HR to determine my training levels at the gym, on my bicycle and while power walking (Nordic walking with poles now) . So my Garmin FR220 with chest belt is still working for me

[Decker in reply to Bazza1234]

Thanks Bazza, yes the main reason is for reliable gps (that is not connected to my phone data plan) and the pace bands too

[ju-ju- Graduate10]

Garmins are great 😎

[IannodaTruffe Graduate10]

Decker, your phone must be really heavy...............

[Decker in reply to IannodaTruffe]

Haha! I like the phone for music, so it still comes out with me. But reliable gps that doesn’t use phone data is something I am trying to work out. The pace alerts would be nice too since I tend to vary alot in pace.

[Anniemurph Graduate10]

Definitely get a Garmin. You can still input to Strava if you want to, but the GPS is far more reliable. There seems to be a good deal on the forerunner 135 at the moment which would do all you need, I think. But there are so many models and you can of course spend hundreds of pounds should you want to do so!

Good run.

[Decker in reply to Anniemurph]

Thanks Annie, right now where I am, the forerunners are still full price but the Vivoactive is $259 CAD which is $100 off the reg price. There are some really fancy ones too but they are out of my budget range 😀

[Tomas Graduate10]

Another vote for a running watch, be it a Garmin ForeRunner or Vivoactive or TomTom (*rushes off to wash mouth with soap after having uttered the name*) or any other brand. In the long run (see what I did there?) they're more informative and easier to work with than the jack-of-all-trades that is a mobile phone.

[Decker]

Haha - yes I can't bring myself to go to Tomtom as I have one in my car which drives me (see what I did there? ) up the wall. My phone is way better with the maps in the car - but thats a conversation for another board probably