Some new research into biphosphanates... - Bone Health and O...

Bone Health and Osteoporosis UK

5,591 members2,461 posts

Some new research into biphosphanates - worth a read

Mo51 profile image
Mo51
8 Replies

imperial.ac.uk/news/177851/...

Written by
Mo51 profile image
Mo51
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
8 Replies
Stayloose profile image
Stayloose

I notice that this study was done 5 yrs ago. I presume it's been researched further. It would be interesting to know about further outcomes. Thank you for posting the link.

FearFracture profile image
FearFracture in reply to Stayloose

Also, all of the patients in this study who had the micro-fractures also had hip fractures, so, as someone who has taken bisphosphonates and who has not had any fractures, seriously hoping that these folks don’t represent what is going on with most ppl taking these meds.

Stayloose profile image
Stayloose in reply to FearFracture

It was one very small study that threw up something strange, not seen before. If it was very concerning I imagine that if it had been replicated, and all variables taken into consideration, there would be reluctance to prescribe it.

Met00 profile image
Met00

There have been one or two other studies done prior to this one, but more to the point, it's already known that taking bisphosphonates long-term can very rarely actually cause unexpected fractures, which is why it's now recommended to have a medication "holiday" after 5 years. Bisphosphonates work by retaining old bone, which then interrupts the process of creating new bone, so the denser bone that results is of poorer quality than normal, healthy bone. This has to be balanced against the evidence that bisphosphonate treatment reduces an individual's fracture risk by 50%, so despite the poorer bone quality, in the short-term you may be less likely to fracture than would have been the case without meds. I say "may be", because some people do continue to fracture, despite the meds - the fracture risk is only reduced, not removed. If you have a low fracture risk to start with, you may wonder whether it's worth the risk of side effects to bring that down. For example, if your fracture risk is 10%, what that actually means is that if 100 people have the same 10% fracture risk, 90 of them won't actually fracture, Without meds, 10 will fracture, with meds, 5 will still fracture. I prefer to look at my chance of not fracturing - so even if I had a 20% chance of fracture, I might still be amongst the 80 in 100 who don't fracture.

walk21 profile image
walk21

Surely it is this sort of work, not new but 2017, that has led to recommendations for a drug holiday so that normal growth and repair can take place for a while.

Mo51 profile image
Mo51 in reply to walk21

Apologies - didn't read the date. It was sent to me as "new". It is new to me 😂😂

Fruitandnutcase profile image
Fruitandnutcase in reply to Mo51

I wouldn’t worry about the timing of it Mo51. Thank you for posting it - it is interesting to read and something to be aware of. As far as I have found there really doesn’t seem to be much in the way of recent independent research into osteoporosis drugs being published. So thank you.

Kaarina profile image
Kaarina in reply to Mo51

No worries, Mo, I read it. Thank you. :)

You may also like...

Looking for some articles/research that refutes Big Pharma’s take on osteoporosis?

research focuses on the systematic review of drug therapy and drug funding policy. His paper...

bisphosphonate research

K2-MK7 research paper

but it could be useful information if trying the exercise and nutrition route....

Different readings on different dexa machines

well I learned something today which may be of both use and interest; Did you know that there is a...

Some drugs not weight based

who got violently ill from taking a bone med injection. Some drugs that are not weight based,...