Raloxifene and improved bone density - Bone Health and O...

Bone Health and Osteoporosis UK

6,310 members•2,769 posts

Raloxifene and improved bone density

5 years ago•7 Replies

I've been taking Raloxifene for 20 years and have not seen any improvement in bone density until my last DEXA. It showed a 5.6% increase in my spine and a 3.8% increase in my right hip. There was a small but insignificant increase in my left hip. The comparisons were made to my previous DEXA which was 2 years and 4 months ago. I'm having trouble believing this; it just seems too good to be true. I've been taking more Vitamin D and eating a lot of dark leafy greens since the last DEXA, but nothing else has changed.

Has anyone else experienced improvement while taking Raloxifene ? Thanks for any comments.

Written by

Pumpkin71

To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .

Read more about...

The ability to reply to this post has been turned off.

7 Replies

•

Nanaedake5 years ago

What is your vitamin D level? The vitamin D Council recommend a level around 100nmol in UK measurement. This is well above NHS supposed sufficiency.

Met005 years ago

Did you have the most recent scan on the same machine as previously?

Pumpkin71• in reply toMet005 years ago

I've had all of my scans at the same hospital, so I'm assuming it was the same machine.

Met00• in reply toPumpkin715 years ago

In theory then the results should be comparable, but as Whitch says, just a different operator can come up with different results. In fact, there have been one or two small scale studies showing widely varying results from the same machine and operator on the same day!!! I was talking to a former DEXA operator yesterday, who told me there's a 10% margin of error with DEXA scanning, so you'd have to have more than a 10% difference in scores to be sure of a change!

Bev53-SB5 years ago

I have been taking Raloxifene and showed bone density and T score improvements after 16 mths. My DEXA was on the same machine as 2yrs previously.

Whitch5 years ago

I would be very careful about reading too much into this - I have been to,d on good authority - that these scans can be very unreliable - varies according to the machines and the operators - and big differences like this are common but not likely to be true !!