Hi,
I underwent an excision of my left lung due to cancer in 2017, I am 70 years old and from the day of the operation I decided not to use medicines but to rely only on rehabilitation, good nutrition, and lots of exercise.
The only help I have are sprays of saline with eucalyptus drops 3 times a day, and very rarely the use of salbutamol via nebulizer.
Now, after almost 4 years the situation has not absolutely worsened, on the other hand I have not suffered any side effects.
The right lung (the only one left) unfortunately suffers from emphysema and fibrosis in a minor (stable) form.
My question is this and I would like it if we could develop a debate on it;
On this US site they talk about stem cell therapy that takes place in different locations, which apparently are not as effective as those made with pluripotent cells (not yet authorized by the FDA) but being autologous they do not have rejection problems but apparently are less effective.
Here in London there is a center in Harley St where they practice this therapy ... I inquired but I got the impression of talking to doctors who in reality do not make promises of any kind, but only suggest a therapy through injections, which I think is anti-inflammatory, with results not guaranteed even to the slightest degree.
All at a cost of 25k + 3k for preliminary tests .
In the USA, on the other hand, the therapy is carried out with much less (10K) and it seems that the results are at least interesting and lasting, as the administration of autologous cells provides a certain benefit and partial regeneration for respiration.
Therefore I am attaching the link pending your kind interest.
bioinformant.com/cost-of-st...
Regards
mario