vItamin D and heart and health - Atrial Fibrillati...

Atrial Fibrillation Support

32,397 members38,733 posts

vItamin D and heart and health

22 Replies

medscape.com/viewarticle/98...

Medscape article on the recent large trials of vitamin D supplementation concluded there is no evidence that supplements help most health issues unless you are in a compromised group ie care home resident or very immune compromised such as Chrohns disease, but there is some evidence supplements may be helpful for serious rheumatoid arthritis and some cancer. If you want to take some as insurance, 1000-2000 iu is enough and a safe level. The results on a big Covid trial are not out yet.

Read more about...
22 Replies
CDreamer profile image
CDreamer

There are studies that the only common factor found in all types of dementia was a high percentage of people with low VitD. The problems come with absorbtion of VitD supplements. All I can say is most doctors now advise VitD with VitK for older people & immune compromised, osteoporosis & a range of other conditions.

mav7 profile image
mav7

All I can say is most doctors now advise VitD with VitK for older people & immune compromised, osteoporosis & a range of other conditions. (CDreamer)

Very true.

Good to have a blood test to determine your level of Vit D and K for proper dosage.

Though that is a very fair study from Harvard, take all these studies with a grain of salt and confer with your medical professional based on your health history.

Recently there was a study questioning the need/value of colonoscopies which is ridiculous.

Auriculaire profile image
Auriculaire in reply tomav7

The study has the major flaw of many vit D studies. A fixed amount of vit D (2000iu) was given rather than supplementing to a particular blood level. Given the enormous variations in absorption of vit D between individuals using a fixed amount is no good. Some people on this dose will reach a desirable blood level - others ( myself included) will not. Very few if any people will be able to attain a level of 50-60 ng / mL (125-150nmol/l)

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob

Thanks for posting.

Sadly it says nothing about my concerns which are a diagnosed Vitamin D deficiency and how this might affect the development of arrythmias.

And remember recommended minimum vitamin D levels are vastly different in different countries, all of which have "experts" interpreting the same research results.

And you have to have much lower Vitamin D levels in UK to even be considered as "deficient" and needing supplementation, compared to say, France.

More research is always welcome and my interest in links between Vitamin D and AF continues.

bob

pusillanimous profile image
pusillanimous in reply toozziebob

I'm surprised to read that there are different values in various countries, whenever I get my complete blood report. it says in each category 'In accordance with International recommendation' and shows your reading against these figures,

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob in reply topusillanimous

Hi,

My level was 22 mmol/L, with <25 deficient in UK.

In France <50 is deficient, although, with conflicting advice on this, it might be <75. I will take more advice on this if others know better.

Anyway UK Vitamin D recommendations seem hopelessly out of date.

Who knows what damage I've caused myself by years of untested and unresolved Vitamin D deficiency?

Hope this helps,

bob

Dippy22 profile image
Dippy22 in reply toozziebob

Hi. My understanding of Vit D levels is that they should be between 50 and 250. With a quality (fish oil based) Vit D + K2 supplement my mine’s now around 200. Unfortunately U.K. doctors think anything over 50 is “adequate”, which is a load of rubbish!

I’m not a conspiracy theorist by any means, but have heard that big pharma regularly quash any mention of health issues related to Vit D deficiency as they’re more interested in plying their drugs to the public.

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob in reply toDippy22

Thanks for your contribution and mention of your current and desired level. Very helpful.

Sadly my GP wouldn't do anything even if I was at the lowest acceptable UK level of 25, never mind the dizzy heights of 50.

After 6 months delay because of restrictions on retesting, I'm going to the Surgery today to ask for the Vitamin D retest which I am due.

Hopefully my level will be a bit higher now, but I believe improvement does take time.

bob

pusillanimous profile image
pusillanimous in reply toozziebob

Thanks Bob - have just pulled out my report before I was put on Vit D for Osteopenia (I live in South Africa). It states Vit D deficiency below 12ng/ml, Vit D insufficiency 12- 20ng/ml. Sufficiency over 20ng/ml. Safe upper limit 50-60ng/ml. I had been deficient and was prescribed a Calciferal tablet ,one per week, once I was in the mid 20s I was reduced to 1 tablet per month, as my doctor considered that it was important to stay below the safe upper limit. Maybe things are different for osteopenia/osteoporosis. Although we have plenty of sun here and I love the warmth, I avoid sitting in it as the instances of malignant melanoma are high. As you say, the values in various countries vary considerably.

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob in reply topusillanimous

Thanks for your contribution.

Remember the units you quote are different to the ones I quoted. I believe you need to multiply your ng/mL by 2.5 to get the same nmol/L number.

So your insufficiently level of 12-20 ng/mL is actually 30-50 in my nmol/L. I was 22 mmol/L, a miserably dangerous deficiency in any language or country.

And remember, as Stephen Carr reports, older people's absorption of Vitamin D through the skin diminishes greatly with age. And diet too.

bob

pusillanimous profile image
pusillanimous in reply toozziebob

Thanks for explaining the science !

Auriculaire profile image
Auriculaire in reply topusillanimous

Here in France sufficiency is over 30ng/mL. Recently the UK has put it's level for sufficiency up to bring it in line with the rest of Europe.

Auriculaire profile image
Auriculaire in reply toozziebob

In France 75 nmols is sufficient.

saulger profile image
saulger

The article indicates that vitamin D may help to reduce inflammation, which could contribute to AFib?

"The reduction in autoimmune diseases suggests that vitamin D may play a role in tamping down inflammation. "

The article does not mention the OH-25 test level that we should be aiming for.

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob in reply tosaulger

Yes, inflammation would do it (AF). Extra stress!

Had my OH-25 level finally retested today. Results in 10 days. Can't wait to see if my first ever supplementation has turned my appalling deficiency (22 nmol/L) into something more in line with current recommendations re AF issues.

bob

saulger profile image
saulger in reply toozziebob

Bravo, Bob. I was 31, which is just on the borderline and took supplements to get up to 54 nmol/L. Good luck.

Auriculaire profile image
Auriculaire in reply tosaulger

That is because the study did not supplement to obtain a stated blood level but just gave everybody 2000iu - flawed methodology.

saulger profile image
saulger in reply toAuriculaire

I agree !

GuyDora profile image
GuyDora

I was at 15, and was diagnosed with heart failure, due to Cardiomypathy. I was prescribed high dose Vit D3, once a week, for three months. I am now at a 1,500 maintenance dose, and test veteeen 31-41.

ozziebob profile image
ozziebob in reply toGuyDora

Are you saying your level was15 nmol/L? That really is dangerously low.

Can I ask at what age your Vitamin D deficiency was discovered?

Did you or your specialists relate any of your medical issues with your Vitamin D deficiency?

Do you consider your medical issues have improved with your currrent higher Vitamin D levels? or other benefits?

bob

GuyDora profile image
GuyDora

My primary definitely felt my low D3 level contributed to how badly the virus affected me, especially, my heart. My EF was at a 17, at that time, and it has increased to a 53, without heart failure, for the last 6 years. I was 59, when I was diagnosed with all of it, including the low D3 level. I had no idea that a Vitamin level could affect my overall health. My Immune system has to stay ramped up, now. It is amazing that they didn’t test everyone’s Vit D levels, when Covid first hit. I was telling my clients, family, and friend to get their levels tested.

GuyDora profile image
GuyDora in reply toGuyDora

I have to add that my heart disorders appear to be hereditary, and that I already had elevated BP and a Left bundle branch block, that was diagnosed, 4 years, earlier, without incident nor problems. It was the viral myopathy that caused the heart failure.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Vitamin D

HiMy vitamin d at last test was 141 and optimal in the range. Is this too high? Do I need to get my...
292426 profile image

Vitamin D

Hi everyone I hope you are all well. Unfortunately, I have not been feeling well and had some blood...
Stucoo profile image

Vitamin D, Fish Oil and NOACS?

Hi folks. On GP advice, and following the example of many lovely people on this forum, I take...
Coco51 profile image

Vitamin D and Covid

Looked at this video at the weekend. Small trial but it showed that patients given vitamin D on...
Physalis profile image

Vitamin D

'mornin' all, I posted yesterday on this subject with the view to hopefully obtain some input from...

Moderation team

See all
Kelley-Admin profile image
Kelley-AdminAdministrator
jess-admin profile image
jess-adminAdministrator
Emily-Admin profile image
Emily-AdminAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.