CT Scan : hello My dads psa increased... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,020 members26,201 posts

CT Scan

Chris52981 profile image
28 Replies

hello

My dads psa increased the last few times it’s now at .60 so the oncologist wants to do a CT scan and then I guess if it shows anything he will change meds- he has had two pet scans prior about a year and then two years ago which were good. But now the pSA is slowly rising - Is this CT Scan common, and what would it show? and if he does end up going off Zytiga and dexamethasone is there still Lots of tx available that can put this back in remission? I’m Just worried.

Written by
Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
28 Replies
Seasid profile image
Seasid

Why don't they order a PSMA PET/CT?

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to Seasid

I am unsure

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply to Chris52981

Where do you live?

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to Seasid

Pennsylvania

tango65 profile image
tango65

A CT scan most probably will not show anything wth a PSA 0.6. Discuss doing a PSMA PET scan which has a detection rate around 65% when the PSA is 0.6.Perhaps he ordered the CT scan because if it does not show anything he qualifies for darolutamide for non metastatic CRPC.

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply to tango65

Good point with Nubequa (Darolutamide).

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to Seasid

He has stage 4 in bones

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to tango65

Are there still lots of tx available when it’s stage 4 and Zytiga stops working

tango65 profile image
tango65 in reply to Chris52981

Yes. He should request provenge a vaccine wich could prolong survival.

He could have chemo with cabazitaxel, or treatment with LU 177 PSMA. Both are systemic treatments and have similar OS.

After any of those treatments he could try enzalutamide or apalutamide or Xofigo.

There are multiple trials with protacs, immunological trials with CAR T cells, BITE compunds etc.. and drugs combinations.

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to tango65

Thank you I thinkHe may be thinking Xofigo. Maybe that is why CT scan? This is about my dad not myself- my dad does ask question and I also at times go along. The oncologist is very nice and he is the director of the hospital- he was also referred to us from Fox chase when we went there for a second opinion, in the beginning. I just like to post things on here to validate that we are doing things in correct direction and it helps me learn and to

Help me ask those

Important questions!

Original psa was 33 and

I think he was stage 3b -He had prostate cancer and it was regional and treated successfully for about 5 years with radiation and lupron-

Then psa started to rise while on hormone vacation after two years not on anything. the dr then did all the scans and said it spread to ribs and spine- did MRI and everything too- had Axumin petscan two

Years when it came

Back along with MRI on spine- so they tried Zytiga prednisone and lupron and was good for two years then when started to rise tried to switch to dexamethasone- but recently it continued to rise between .30, .43, .60 now

On Zytiga dexamethasone also along with lupron and Xgeva!

tango65 profile image
tango65 in reply to Chris52981

If PSA is going up when on ADT and zytiga, the cancer is mCRPC.

When a drug like zytiga fails it seems better to continue treatment with chemo or Lu 177 PSMA.

The new anti androgens, Abiraterone, enzalutamide etc.. have crossed resistance.

He should request Provenge and a biopsy if possible.

Seasid profile image
Seasid

This is from your post from a year ago:

"eeGee1 year ago

Prior to my prostate removal on 4/6/21 my PSA was 111, and the abominal/pelvic area and full body CT scans showed no progression beyond the prostate. My Surgeon waited three months to recheck my PSA which was then 268! We then did an Axium PET scan and found numerous areas of cancerous lesions. It's therefore been my own and other's experience that the CT scans are virtually worthless. If you really want to see the true picture, you need to get a PET scan."

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981

He had Axumin pet scan in past already

Seasid profile image
Seasid

It would be nice if you could find some time to fill out your profile information.

It could help to others to provide a better information. It is very frustrating not to be able to answer properly your question.

Can you communicate with your oncologist, he must have all the information in front of him unlike us.

If you can't communicate with your oncologist be best would be to find a new one. Nobody is irreplaceable.

I understand that it is not preferable to change doctors, but maybe you could get a second opinion from someone else?

MichaelDD profile image
MichaelDD

I get a CT scan every 6 months. Blood work for me is every 3 months.I am scheduled for my scan and blood work the end of this month.I am metastatic to my lungs. The larger nodules the CT scan sees those. My oncologists use those CT scans to verify that there is no growth.I was part of the PSMA GA-68 scan trial at UCSF. That's where my lung nodules were found. Usually they like to see a 2.0 PSA before doing a PSMAGA68 scan.

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply to MichaelDD

I agree about doing the GA68 PSMA PET at PSA 2. Except maybe in my situation when I am afraid of brain metastasis. I have a bone met in my neck just under my skull.

MichaelDD profile image
MichaelDD in reply to Seasid

Just a note.. my lung metastasis according to my oncologist(s) are JUST as worried (or more so)about my lung mets spreading to my brain then as if I had bone mets. Soft tissue to soft tissue is what mine is/would be. If you want a PSMAGA68 you can pay for it yourself. The question is what do you derive after you get it? I'm sure you're being treated the best your oncologist can do right now.

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply to MichaelDD

I am unsure.

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply to MichaelDD

What is your PSA now? Did they take a tumor biopsy sample for genetic testing?

cesces profile image
cesces

Most of these scans can generate a fair number of false negative results at low PSA levels.

Most of them seem to minimize false negatives if you wait until you have a PSA of 2.0

Personally I wouldn't do a scan until I reached a PSA of 2.0 or higher.

If you do it before then, and you get a negative, how much confidence can you have in the results... without doing a second scan.

If you want to do a once and done, wait until your PSA reaches 2.0 to do the scan

Cooolone profile image
Cooolone

It's always a conundrum regarding the timing of the ultra-sensitive PSMA test... Wait until it's efficacy level is assured, or take a shot early and try and find something that may be causing the PSA... But the G68-PSMA is still the most sensitive, and even 65% @ .06ng is better than anything else... But what to do, what to do? Let the little buggers (cancer cells) do their dastardly deeds unabated while waiting for it to progress to the point it can be seen?

I'm not saying or advocating either way, just highlighting another choice we must all make and how it may impact our decisions and results! This crazy rollercoaster we all ride on with a PCa diagnosis!

Best Regards

SteveTheJ profile image
SteveTheJ

Bone scan shows tumors in bones. CT scan shows tumors in soft tissue.

Bowmaster profile image
Bowmaster

Sorry to hear about your Dad . As far as i know PET SANN IS THE BEST scanner out there ! My PSA is at 40 now and i will be going for a PET scann soon . I am 67 and was operated 2002 and had my prostate removed in Toronto . My PSA came back 5 years later and keeps on goin up ever since .

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981 in reply to Bowmaster

I guess there is still a lot out there so that’s the good news

NecessarilySo profile image
NecessarilySo

Here's my PSA over the 14 years since I was diagnosed with PC. I have had scans but all were negative. They can't see anything under 1/2 inch. But for your dad, at PSA .6, you shouldn't worry. because his prostate has not been removed. My PSA rose to 35 during a four-year vacation from Lupron, then upon resuming Lupron it dropped to <0.1, undetectable, for past two years."According to the American Urological Association, Serum PSA should

decrease and remain at undetectable levels after radical

prostatectomy. The AUA defines biochemical recurrence as an initial

PSA value 0.2 ng/mL or greater followed by a subsequent confirmatory

PSA value 0.2 ng/mL or greater.

Values obtained with different assay methods or kits cannot be used

interchangeably. Results cannot be interpreted as absolute evidence

of the presence or absence of malignant disease."

PSA 2008-2022
Break60 profile image
Break60

You’ll get a more accurate result if psa is between 1.5 and 2.0.

Tmac27 profile image
Tmac27

Has anyone tried high dose IV vitamin C?

harleyharhar profile image
harleyharhar in reply to Tmac27

hello, we have tried this along with ozone eboo and some oral supplements when we found out dad had bone mets, dad reported feeling great/better/stronger, although at that time even with bone mets his psa was less then 4

You may also like...

Confusing CT scan results

My PSA has been rising slowly after prostate removal two years ago. Was at zero months after and...

When to do a CT scan?

and his PSA #s were coming down incrementally. But surprisingly the ct scan after the chemo showed...

Elgie's bone scan and CT scan

... are there any scans that tell you if it's cancer and no guessing? Elgie's psa doesn't elevate.

Bone Scan an CT clear!

Finally got the results of my bone and ct scans yesterday! Im very happy about that gor sure. But...

Latest CT Scan and Radiation

on a CT scan (other than the extensive bone metastases). 2) It turns out my MO is only guessing...