New umbrella study, below [1].
With popular topics, after a while there may be so many studies that it can be difficult to draw conclusions. That's where a meta-analysis becomes useful. The authors set conditions for inclusion/exclusion & come up with conclusions. Which is very nice so long as your favorite studies have not been excluded.
But what if there are many meta-analyses? We are back in the same boat. That's where the umbrella review comes in. It analyses the results of meta-analyses that meet certain inclusion criteria. Do we get closer to the truth? Or is there a further watering down of the findings from your favorite study?
Anyway, from the first cruciferous vegetable umbrella study (of 41 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 303 observational studies):
"Conclusions: ... {cruciferous vegetable} intake might be associated with beneficial effects on several health-related outcomes (gastric cancer, lung cancer, endometrial cancer, and all-cause mortality)."
"all-cause mortality" possibility has to be a good thing but PCa mortality didn't make the list.
OK. To simplify the analysis of your reponses, enter:
"A" ... signifying "I don't like brocolli & never expected it to help.
"B" ... balderdash!!!
"C" ... Undecided
-Patrick
[1] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/353...
Review Food Funct
. 2022 Mar 30. doi: 10.1039/d1fo03094a. Online ahead of print.
Cruciferous vegetable consumption and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of 41 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 303 observational studies
Yi-Zi Li 1 2 , Zhi-Yong Yang 3 , Ting-Ting Gong 4 , Ya-Shu Liu 1 2 , Fang-Hua Liu 1 2 , Zhao-Yan Wen 1 2 , Xin-Yu Li 1 2 , Chang Gao 1 2 , Meng Luan 1 2 4 , Yu-Hong Zhao 1 2 , Qi-Jun Wu 1 2 4
Affiliations collapse
Affiliations
1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, P. R. China. wuqj@sj-hospital.org.
2 Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
3 Department of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, San Hao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, P. R. China. gongtt@sj-hospital.org.
PMID: 35352732 DOI: 10.1039/d1fo03094a
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological studies evaluating the associations between the consumption of cruciferous vegetables (CV) and diverse health outcomes have generated inconsistent findings. Therefore, we carried out an umbrella review to systematically summarize existing evidence on this topic. Methods: This study had been registered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42021262011). Relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of science, and Embase databases from inception up to March 15, 2021. Observational studies investigating the association between CV intake and multiple health outcomes in humans were eligible for inclusion. The validated AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) instrument was utilized for assessing the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews. For each meta-analysis, we assessed the summary effect size by using fixed and random effects models, 95% prediction intervals, heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects, and excess significance bias. Results: Our umbrella review included 41 meta-analyses of 303 individual studies involving 13 394 722 participants. Twenty-four health outcomes including cancers (n = 23), cardiovascular disease (n = 12), mortality (n = 5), and metabolic diseases (n = 1) were evaluated. The summary random effects estimates were significant at P < 0.05 in 24 meta-analyses - all of which reported decreased risks of health outcomes. All were of moderate methodological quality in our study. Of the 41 meta-analyses, we observed suggestive evidence for beneficial associations between gastric cancer, lung cancer, endometrial cancer, and all-cause mortality. Moreover, 16 associations were supported by weak evidence, including breast cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, colon cancer, colorectal adenoma, colorectal neoplasm, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and total cancer. Conclusions: It revealed that CV intake might be associated with beneficial effects on several health-related outcomes (gastric cancer, lung cancer, endometrial cancer, and all-cause mortality). Other associations could be genuine, but substantial uncertainty remains. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between the consumption of CV and various health outcomes as well as robust randomized controlled trials in the future.