This study of 12 randomized clinical trials comprising 13 524 participants observed an increased risk of cognitive toxic effects, fatigue, and falls among individuals treated with second-generation AAs (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide).
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Malgorzata K. Nowakowska, BS1; Rachel M. Ortega, MSA1; Mackenzie R. Wehner, MD, MPhil2,3; et al Kevin T. Nead, MD, MPhil4,5
JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(7):930-937. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0998
”Main Outcomes and Measures Risk ratios (RRs) and SEs were calculated for cognitive toxic effects, asthenic toxic effects, and falls. Because fatigue was the asthenic toxic effect extracted from all studies, data on fatigue are specified in the results. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics.
Results The systematic review included 12 studies comprising 13 524 participants. Included studies had a low risk of bias. An increased risk of cognitive toxic effects (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.30-3.38; P = .002) and fatigue (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54; P < .001) was noted among individuals treated with second-generation AAs vs those in the control arms. The findings were consistent in studies that included traditional hormone therapy in both treatment arms for cognitive toxic effects (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12-2.79; P = .01) and fatigue (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.58; P = .003). Meta-regression supported that, across studies, increased age was associated with a greater risk of fatigue with second-generation AAs (coefficient, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.04-0.12; P < .001). In addition, the use of second-generation AAs was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75; P = .001).
Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that second-generation AAs carry an increased risk of cognitive and functional toxic effects, including when added to traditional forms of hormone therapy.”