I need good honest logical insights - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,190 members26,458 posts

I need good honest logical insights

GVJosephDoc profile image
36 Replies

Two “mpMRI’s” were negative with no suspicious areas …. one was last Aug 2020 and one done recently on 9/10

PiRads 2

Diagnostic radiologist: Cancer unlikely

Images consistent with BPH

PSA is 7

DRE normal

Doc wants to do TRUS

I don’t want it

I am almost 70

Excellent health

Should I get an invasive biopsy that is at most going to sample .3% of the gland?

Please help me

Written by
GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
36 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Ask for Prostate Health Index (PHI) instead.

Chugach profile image
Chugach

PSA 7. Get a biopsy!

Your asking this question to a bunch of men who have terminal stage 4 cancer that they are trying to manage for as long as possible before we likely in the end lose the fight. A biopsy? that’s nothing to worry about compared to chemical castration, chemo, radiation, surgery, bone mets slowly breaking down your bones causing crushing pain.

Get the test and put your mind to rest

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to Chugach

👍

You may want to pose your question here instead

healingwell.com/community/d...

There you will find men who are closer to the problem you are currently facing.

Many men here had psa’s in the hundreds or even thousands when they first found out…..and honestly would love to turn back time and be in a position to catch it early.

The truth will set you free.

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc

Thanks!

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling in reply to GVJosephDoc

Another non-invasive tool before a TARGETED BIOPSY *not random please*

Accurate biopsy method >>

seedos.co.uk/Prostate%20Bio...

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to addicted2cycling

Thanks I agree

Schwah profile image
Schwah

No no no. Random biopsy’s are insane. I learned the hard way. 0/14 on random and 3-3 on MRI guided biopsy. If they see nothing in your MRIs, I’d wait and keep doing your PSA Every other month and if it continues to rise I’d do another MRI. Or if your PSA breaks 10, and another MRI is negative, maybe you do a random. Another option is to have your MRIs read by a top Radioligist at a top center like ucla etc Ff or. Second opinion.

Schwah

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to Schwah

Thanks

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to Schwah

Thanks I agree with you and will tell doc I want to wait

Maybe because of a 17% on a 4K he wants to cover all bases

However with two negative mpMRI’s and a normal DRE I think I could wait even though PSA is 7

The mpMRI report said I had BPH so that could be the reason for a rising PSA

My volume is 61cc and the density is .11

I wish this stress would go away but being type AAA in personality my nerves are shot

I also know a random TRUS is not reliable

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to GVJosephDoc

DREs are very imprecise. A normal DRE means nothing. I had normal DREs when diagnosed with stage 4 mPCa with cancer in 11 of 12 zones targeted in my prostate biopsy. Gleason 8

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling in reply to 6357axbz

My PCP felt the lump in prostate and she said to go to urologist. STUPID ME didn't follow her advice since I was training for my 2nd IRONMAN TRIATHLON and at age 64 I needed all the training I could get. FINALLY went to URO. some 8 months later and the result was 5+5. REALLY STUPID ME for procrastinating.

Boywonder56 profile image
Boywonder56 in reply to addicted2cycling

Did the same....til my np said....go to uro.....today!.....and you see what ship’im on..

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to 6357axbz

I agree DRE very subjective but my mpMRI done twice show nothing

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling in reply to GVJosephDoc

Just saying that knowing where I am NOW and was 6+ years ago, if I was in your position NOW I would 1st avail myself of one or more of the *non-invasive tests* that could shed some light on condition and then proceed always realizing that nothing is as accurate/informative as a proper biopsy.

Schwah profile image
Schwah in reply to GVJosephDoc

docpanel.com/blog/post/3-wa...

Great article discussing the subject that underscores the accuracy of MRIs vs biopsies.

“Compared with biopsy alone, MRI with or without targeted biopsy was associated with a 57 percent improvement. in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and a 77 percent reduction in the number of cores taken per procedure.”

Those are big numbers.

Schwah

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to Schwah

Thanks so very much I am so nervous

maley2711 profile image
maley2711

Most guidelines for biopsy after a positive MRI include a standard 12 core biopsy....though small in number, an additionaal number of significant cancers are found. I'm a good example, 6 total cores from my PIRADS 5 found nothing but benign tissue........ one of my standard nontargeted cores contained 4+5 cancer!!!!! Another core was 3+3. Good luck with your decision ! Did you ask your Doc for reason to advise standard biopsy also?

Stevecavill profile image
Stevecavill

I would say no. For a start, your urologist should be doing trans perineal biopsy, if they are stillDoing trans rectal, get another urologist !

PSA is pretty high, but is it increasing? What’s the psa density (psa compared to Volume of prostate). What makes the urologist think they will find cancer with a biopsy ?

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to Stevecavill

PSA increasing a little and at 7

Age 70

Density is .11Two negative mpMRI’s

The 4K test came back at 17%

I guess urologist wants to be thorough but I really don’t want a biopsy with no targeted areas since two mpMRI’s were negative for suspicious areas

Stevecavill profile image
Stevecavill in reply to GVJosephDoc

I would be just as hesitant as you. A biopsy would be shooting in the dark.

LowT profile image
LowT

At this time no. What is your prostate volume on MRI?

What is percent PSA?

What is your PSA density?

Second read on MRI from major center.

Could even do short trial of 5 alpha reductase inhibitor to assess if PSA level is affected.

Any other medical issues?

There is no hurry!

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to LowT

PSA density is .11No family history

Excellent health

160lbs

Good shape

I at get a second read but the diagnostic radiologist that reads is well known in NJ and reads thousands

Thoughts?

LowT profile image
LowT

Family history?

LowT profile image
LowT

Your gland is twice normal size. Theoretically you can double your PSA value to 8 and therefore most likely PSA is coming from large gland. No guarantees of course.

If a trial of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors significantly drop PSA that would be supportive evidence for the BPH being responsible for the elevation. Again no guarantees.

If second read confirms first you are in no hurray to do anything other than what has been done. You are on top of this.

Biopsies are invasive and not without complications. What was your percent free PSA, if done.

GVJosephDoc profile image
GVJosephDoc in reply to LowT

My percent PSA was 18% I believe it’s best higher ?

LowT profile image
LowT in reply to GVJosephDoc

True but it is not 10%! Has it been repeated?

NecessarilySo profile image
NecessarilySo

I would accept your report as cancer unlikely, BPH likely. "... benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in elders may show PSA level of 7 or 9 as well in early stage." See: bloodtestsresults.com/norma....

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

"I need good honest logical insights"

See a Gypsy Fortune Teller ASAP...

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Saturday 10/02/2021 12:31 PM DST

Boywonder56 profile image
Boywonder56 in reply to j-o-h-n

I used to have crysyal balls.....i digress..

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to Boywonder56

We're they.............

cubic,

tetragonal,

hexagonal (trigonal),

orthorhombic,

monoclinic, or

triclinic?

I concentrate...

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Saturday 10/02/2021 9:52 PM DST

Boywonder56 profile image
Boywonder56 in reply to j-o-h-n

Uh.....round....

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to Boywonder56

Uh.... Russian egg shaped...

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Sunday 10/03/2021 2:39 PM DST

Boywonder56 profile image
Boywonder56 in reply to j-o-h-n

Yeah thats it ...without the fabrege fillagreee ....very socialistic

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to Boywonder56

I was referring to the Ukrainian hand painted Pysanky Eggs (before they're boiled)....

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Sunday 10/03/2021 8:26 PM DST

DRKC81 profile image
DRKC81

GVJosephDoc did you get a second opinion on the MRI, who did you go to ? I am in NJ as well and this info would be more than helpful for me

You may also like...

PSA 0.03, testosterone 36.0 ng/dl - Honestly, how am I doing?

PSA 0.03, testosterone 36.0 ng/dL: these are my current (March 2021)lab results after prostate...

Some much needed good news

here to understandably complain and get pissed, I wanted to give some good news. I feel fucking...

need some insight into a treatment plan by two separate oncologists

robotic prostectomy. Aug 31st. My Gleason was downgraded to a 7 Gleason 4+3 My psa rose from 0.01...

Hoping for some reassurance and insight

pelvic thyroid, gleason score 4+5=9 and PSA 68. His first PSA check was in December 2017 and it was...

Any insight into # platinum chemo cycles?

irritant I have of which I'm sure will not be the only one is: I have no idea what the treatment...