PSA from 0.15 to 2.42 in 12 months; b... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

20,967 members26,131 posts

PSA from 0.15 to 2.42 in 12 months; but no metastasis?

novatimo profile image
21 Replies

Asking advice and thoughts on my situation. I'm 5 years post IMRT to prostate and pelvic LN in 2015. Original PCa diagnosis in 2012 with Gleason 9 (4+5), Stage 4 ('locally advanced', no mets). Three cycles of ADT (4-6 months each) from 2012-2016.

From Aug 2019 to Aug 2020 PSA went from 0.15 to 2.42. In Oct. had an Axumin scan that showed no mets to soft tissue or bone, followed by two different circulating tumor cell tests to check for micrometastasis (Foundation One Liquid CDx and Biocept). Neither found any CTCs.

With no sign of mets I'm not sure what to make of the PSA increase.

[I'm on the Care Oncology protocol (Metformin, Atorvastatin, Mebendazole, Doxycycline), plus Modified Citrus Pectin, 81mg aspirin, and other supplements to inhibit angiogenesis and promote apoptosis.]

Your thoughts?

Written by
novatimo profile image
novatimo
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
21 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Why did you start and stop and start adjuvant ADT? - that selects for resistant strains. At least 18 month continuous is needed to kill off the remainder. Too late now. You might try a PSMA scan, or just go on enhanced ADT. CTCs have high false negatives.

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Tall_Allen

Had a PSMA in Berlin in 2018. No mets found. Since PSMA not yet FDA approved in U.S. my insurance won't pay for it and I can't afford it. Believe I'm eligible for this PSMA clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show... and twice contacted them but no reply.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to novatimo

It really doesn't matter if you detect a met or not - the remedy is the same. If you can't tolerate ADT, you can perhaps get chemo without ADT, but I doubt that it is as effective. Can the side effects you suffer from ADT be managed?

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Tall_Allen

Intolerable ADT SEs were not able to be managed. Tried everything, which is why I stopped and have felt so much healthier without it and remained free of any identifiable metastasis.

Going forward, I'm confident that the 4-drug Care Oncology protocol is a multi-pronged approach to make the PCa a chronic manageable condition. See: careoncology.com/how-it-wor....

Knowing that PSA is an imperfect biomarker, but still the primary metric that oncologists use, what I'm really asking here is this: Does the PSA rise solely indicate cancer activity or, in the absence of any identifiable metastasis, might it be attributable to other factors?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to novatimo

You have had a biochemical recurrence. Whether there is a clinical recurrence has not been determined, but with your adverse initial diagnosis, it has to be strongly suspected. There is an easy way to tell - take some Casodex for just a month. If your PSA goes down while on Casodex, you can be pretty sure that there are micrometastases. Good luck with the cocktail.

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Tall_Allen

Thanks TA. My CO doc had suggested Casodex back in August, which my MO prescribed, but my insurer wouldn't approve since it wasn't 'standard of care' for use by itself. However, I will share your post with her and ask her to resubmit for insurance approval. While I assume that she will understand why you're suggesting this Casodex 'trial', can you pls share with me in just a few words why or how a PSA decrease while on Casodex will indicate presence of micrometastases?

noahware profile image
noahware in reply to novatimo

Generic Casodex (bicalutamide) is dirt cheap. It is annoying when insurers refuse to cover something that will save them money, as bicalutamide is surely less costly than SOC. But I doubt you can appeal on that basis alone.

The fact is, even though the FDA only ever approved bical as a 50mg addition to ADT, there are dozens of countries that DID approve it as 150mg monotherapy, and docs in the US have (and still do) sometimes prescribe it this way, off-label, even as its use has fallen in favor of newer, pricier drugs.

My insurer (Cigna) covers mine, as 150mg monotherapy. I pay $7/mo out of pocket for it. Not sure what it would cost without insurance, but perhaps there are other ways to get a discounted price.

If you make an appeal, be sure to include references to papers such as these:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JC....

eu-openscience.europeanurol...

"Two phase III randomized trials of similar design

have compared bicalutamide (‘Casodex’) 150 mg

monotherapy and castration in men with either locally

advanced or metastatic disease. In patients

with locally advanced disease ( n ¼ 480), a mature

analysis (56% deaths) at a median follow-up of 6.3

years, showed that overall survival did not differ significantly between the bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy and castration groups.

Significant advantages for bicalutamide 150 mg over castration in

the domains of physical capacity ( p ¼ 0:046) and

sexual interest ( p ¼ 0:029) were seen (Fig. 4); trends

favoring bicalutamide 150 mg in six of the remaining

seven domains were also apparent (Fig. 4). Furthermore, a recent prospective, open-label, parallel-group

study in 103 men with prostate cancer (T1–4, Nx, M0)

randomized to receive bicalutamide 150 mg or medical

castration for 2 years, showed that baseline bone

mineral density was maintained in patients receiving

bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy, and progressively

decreased in castrated patients, over the 2 years"

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to novatimo

If your PSA increase is due to a benign cause (prostatitis), then Casodex will have no effect on your PSA. It will only reduce your PSA is the PSA increase is from prostate cancer.

Magnus1964 profile image
Magnus1964

I'm not sure I understand when you say "Three cycles of ADT (4-6 months each) from 2012-2016"

What ADT drugs were you on and why start and stop?

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Magnus1964

Intolerable side effects from Zoladex, Lupron and Firmagon.

Magnus1964 profile image
Magnus1964 in reply to novatimo

Maybe you could try casodex, it's an older ADT drug with fewer side effects.

novatimo profile image
novatimo

Thanks Nalakrats. Based on my own prior experience and some posts on this site, I requested that my MO put me on Cabergoline (prolactin blocker), which I was on a number of years ago and which dramatically lowered my prolactin. Since restarting Cabergoline my prolactin went from 7.1 (Aug) to 0.1 (Oct).

novatimo profile image
novatimo

Friends: I found this AUA link to also be helpful to my situation.

auanet.org/guidelines/advan...

According to the latest AUA guidelines, it appears that for the group of patients in which I fall - Biochemical Recurrence without Metastatic Disease after Exhaustion of Local Treatment Options - items 4 through 8 are applicable, specifically:

Item 7: "For patients with a rising PSA after failure of local therapy and no demonstrated metastatic disease by conventional imaging, clinicians should offer observation or clinical trial enrollment."

Item 8: "ADT should not be routinely initiated in this population (Expert Opinion). However, if ADT is initiated in the absence of metastatic disease, intermittent ADT may be offered in lieu of continuous ADT."

So clinical observation, perhaps combined with a brief trial of Casodex to further identify if micrometastasis is present, seems the prudent path to follow at this time. Thanks all!

MateoBeach profile image
MateoBeach

Also intolerant of ADT I went on Casodex (combined with dutasteride which is helpful in this setting). It provided nearly 5 years of control before failing and with very minimal SEs.

Fanger1 profile image
Fanger1

In addition to PSA testing, recommend CTC testing on a regular basis. Imaging with Ga-PSMA Pet/CT would be helpful and it's now FDA approved at UCSF or UCLA. Best of luck with your case!

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Fanger1

I've tried multiple times to get a response from the contact person at this Stanford PSMA clinical trial, but no luck. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show... Do you have specific contact info for the PSMA scan at UCSF or UCLA ?

mrssnappy profile image
mrssnappy in reply to novatimo

This was our contact for UCLA. PSMA done end of Oct. before FDA approval so I don't know how things have changed.

Rejah Alano

Research Assistant

UCLA Nuclear Medicine

200 Medical Plaza, Suite B114

Los Angeles, CA 90095

PHONE: (310) 206- 7372

FAX: (310) 206- 4899

RMAlano@mednet.ucla.edu

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to mrssnappy

Thank you!

Fanger1 profile image
Fanger1

The main researcher at UCSF is Dr. Thomas Hope. Here's a contact person you could try reaching out to:

Matthew TanakaClinical Research Coordinator

UCSF Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging

185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350

San Francisco, CA 94107

Tel: (415) 353-4216 | Fax: (415) 353-9425

Email: Matthew.Tanaka@ucsf.edu

novatimo profile image
novatimo in reply to Fanger1

Thank you. Will follow up.

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

PSA is a reminder not to forget your Pca.......

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Monday 12/07/2020 2:17 PM EST - Remembering our heroes of 12/07/1941.

You may also like...

Metastasis with undetectable PSA

possible to have metastatic PC with an undetectable PSA? I’ve had persistent lower hip/back pain...

Growing bone metastasis with a psa of 0.03

diagnosed August 31,2017 Stage 4,gleason 9,psa 64, 4 x bone mets and 1 in lymph node. Started...

PSA rising to 0.7 after 12 months undetectable NADIR

diagnosed Sep 2017 at the age of 70, PSA 187, biopsy 12 cor all 4 + 4 = 8, stage 4 metastatic...

One month Holiday from Casodex, PSA increased

English) 2014 RRP Gleason score 3+4 PSA 5,17 2017 SBRT 7 times at PSA 0.32 PSA climbing slowly...

In 4 months of PSA from 0.17 to 0.73

My PSA is starting to rise progressively in the last 4 readings (0.17, 0.19, 0.26, 0.45 and the last