High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy combined... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,371 members28,135 posts

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy.

pjoshea13 profile image
6 Replies

New Norwegian study.

Of course, it is merely an observational study.

"We investigated 10-year PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in high-risk patients treated with HDR-BT/EBRT (calculated EQD2 = 102 Gy) compared to EBRT alone (70 Gy)."

"Men with high-risk PCa have a significantly reduced PCSM and OM rates when treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy achieved by HDR-BT/EBRT compared to EBRT alone (70 Gy)"

"The combined HDR-BT/EBRT treatment was found to give a 3.6-fold decrease in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality (PCSM) and a 1.6-fold decrease in Overall Mortality (OM). Gleason score and type of treatment strongly influenced PCSM whereas only treatment modality was associated with OM."

-Patrick

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/303...

Radiother Oncol. 2018 Oct 30. pii: S0167-8140(18)33537-0. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.013. [Epub ahead of print]

Ten-year survival after High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: A comparison with the Norwegian SPCG-7 cohort.

Wedde TB1, Småstuen MC2, Brabrand S3, Fosså SD4, Kaasa S5, Tafjord G3, Russnes KM6, Hellebust TP7, Lilleby W3.

Author information

1

Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: t.b.wedde@studmed.uio.no.

2

Department of Health, Nutrition and Management, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway. Electronic address: miladacv@medisin.uio.no.

3

Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

4

National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

5

Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Norway.

6

Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

7

Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The survival benefit of dose-escalation with High-Dose-Rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost combined with External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains debatable. We investigated 10-year PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in high-risk patients treated with HDR-BT/EBRT (calculated EQD2 = 102 Gy) compared to EBRT alone (70 Gy).

METHODS:

HDR-BT boosts (10 Gy × 2) were given 2 weeks apart followed by 50 Gy conformal EBRT (2 Gy × 25) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The HDR-BT/EBRT group (N:325) received Androgen Deprivation Therapy for a median duration of 2 years. The historical control group (N:296), received a median dose of 70 Gy (2 Gy × 35) to the prostate and seminal vesicles with lifelong Anti-Androgen Treatment. For each treatment group PCSM and OM were established by competing-risk analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses respectively. Differences were evaluated by the logrank test. Independent associations were established by Cox regression analyses. Significance level set to p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

Median follow-up was 104 and 120 months for the HDR-BT/EBRT and the EBRT group respectively. A 3.6-fold decreased risk of PCSM (p < 0.01) and a 1.6-fold decreased risk of OM (p = 0.02) in the HDR-BT/EBRT cohort compared to the EBRT-only group were revealed. Ten-year OM and PCSM rates were 16% and 2.5% in the HDR-BT/EBRT group versus 23% and 8.2% in the EBRT-only group respectively. Both treatment modality (HR = 3.59, 95%CI 1.50-8.59) and Gleason score (HR = 2.48, 95%CI 1.18-5.21) were associated with PCSM. Only treatment modality (HR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.08-2.44) was significantly associated with OM.

CONCLUSIONS:

Men with high-risk PCa have a significantly reduced PCSM and OM rates when treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy achieved by HDR-BT/EBRT compared to EBRT alone (70 Gy). A Gleason score of 8-10 was independently associated with increased risk of PCSM. Randomized studies are warranted.

SUMMARY:

Observational study of 10-year survival in high-risk Prostate Cancer (PCa) after High-Dose-Rate brachytherapy combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy (HDR-BT/EBRT) compared to EBRT alone. The combined HDR-BT/EBRT treatment was found to give a 3.6-fold decrease in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality (PCSM) and a 1.6-fold decrease in Overall Mortality (OM). Gleason score and type of treatment strongly influenced PCSM whereas only treatment modality was associated with OM. The observed benefits of dose-escalation warrant future randomized trials.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Brachytherapy versus external beam radiation treatment; HDR-brachytherapy; High-risk; Overall mortality; Prostate cancer; Prostate-cancer-specific mortality

PMID: 30389241 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.013

Written by
pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
cesanon profile image
cesanon

This is the standard Datolli Clinic treatment protocol.

AlanMeyer profile image
AlanMeyer

I had HDR_BT + EBRT + Lupron (4 months) in 2003 for a G 4+3 cancer and I'm still here, apparently (knock on wood) cancer free. I lucked out.

I wonder how this compares to the modern SBRT protocols.

Alan

in reply toAlanMeyer

Was it spread to lymph nodes, or seminal vesicle or bones?

AlanMeyer profile image
AlanMeyer in reply to

To the best of my knowledge it had not spread outside the prostate bed. At the time that I had the treatment I knew squat about prostate cancer and didn't know to ask the right questions.

Alan

VHRguy profile image
VHRguy

Just an observation - 70 Gy EBRT is well below current dose-escalated protocols of 79.2 Gy or a little more possible by IGRT. It would be interesting to see a similar comparison with more contemporary protocols.

My urologist disparaged brachytherapy -- maybe because it wasn't in the bag of tricks of the radiation treatment center he was affiliated with, which offered only external beam? It is tough dealing with PC -- the burden is on you to make good decisions at a time when you are still in shock and not well informed on the treatment options. At that time I was also on an insurance plan that limited me to in-network providers and also requiring a referral -- I couldn't go where ever I wanted unless I paid out of pocket.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Effectiveness of Radical Prostatectomy Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy Plus Brachytherapy in Patients with High-risk Localized PCa.

New study below. When I opted for Radical Prostatectomy [RP] 14 years ago it was on the basis of...
pjoshea13 profile image

ADT or Brachytherapy Boost - plus External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized PCa.

New meta-analysis below [1] [2]. I remember a significant study where brachy boost reduced PCa...
pjoshea13 profile image

Survival after radiotherapy vs. radical prostatectomy for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer

New study below [1]. "Highlights • "There was no difference in survival between radical...
pjoshea13 profile image

Gleason Score 10.

New study below [1]. A GS=10 is rare, but that's no consolation to the men who receive the...
pjoshea13 profile image

Radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in Gleason 9-10.

New German/Italian/Canadian study below [1]. "Gleason Score (GS) 9-10 prostate cancer is associated...
pjoshea13 profile image