I have been titrating up my dose of Levo for some months now, having eventually convinced my endo that I have central hypothyroidism. (Thanks to those in this forum for helping me understand this and making my case).
As my Levo dose has increased my TSH has fallen, and in my most recent test the TSH is now below range, although my FT4 is still only at approx. 50% of its range. I have been told to target the top quartile of the range, and so have increased from 125mcg to 150mcg this week.
Unsurprisingly, my GP has flagged the TSH as abnormal and I received a text message for me to make an appointment to discuss this. Instead I have written to him, explaining that a low TSH, in the context of central hypothyroidism and FT4 mid-range, is nothing to worry about.
I realise that low TSH in the context of primary hypothyroidism can indicate over-medication, or it could indicate hyperthyroidism, both of which could be confirmed by testing FT4 and FT3. But with central hypothyroidism it is the TSH level that is the primary problem, and therefore the TSH is ignored in titrating the dose, and FT4 is used, targeting the top quarter of the range.
I do understand that if one plotted TSH against osteoporosis there would be a correlation, with low TSH and osteoporosis being 'linked', but they will only be linked in those people who are either overmedicated or those with hyperthyroidism. It is, after all, high levels of thyroid hormone that causes bone density loss, not low TSH in and of itself. As far as I am aware, the only thing that TSH does in the body is stimulate the thyroid.
So, I am posting on here to ask for confirmation that I am correct. I am 99% sure that I am, and frankly the mechanics of this are really quite simple.
So, to be clear, my assertion is that a low/suppressed TSH, in and of itself, does not cause any harm.
TIA