Long-Term Antithyroid Drug Treatment of Patient... - Thyroid UK

Thyroid UK

141,191 members166,429 posts

Long-Term Antithyroid Drug Treatment of Patients With Graves’ Disease

ling profile image
ling
31 Replies

liebertpub.com/doi/full/10....

This cohort of antithyroid-drug–treated adult Graves’ disease patients is one of the largest reported in the literature and has one of the longest follow-up periods. The article presents new information regarding patterns of disappearance of serum TRAb concentrations over time, which appear to have an impact on the probability of remission.

The aim of the current study was to describe long-term outcomes in 549 adult patients with Graves’ disease treated with antithyroid drugs for >8 years and to relate remission and final outcomes to patterns of serum TRAb titers (6).

In the second scenario, antithyroid drugs are given for as long as necessary, until TRAbs disappear. This could be for years or even for a lifetime (4,5).

The patients were followed from 8 to 36 years. Greater than 90% of patients were treated with methimazole.

The patients were classified into four groups after follow-up: Group A0 were TRAb-negative at the outset,

Group A2 became TRAb-negative within 2 years of methimazole treatment,

Group A5 became TRAb-negative after 2 to 5 years of treatment (all combined into Group A), and

Group B, in whom TRAbs remained positive after >5 years of continuous treatment.

However, in approximately 50% of Group A patients whose TRAb became negative, TRAb levels subsequently became positive again (Group 1A); in these patients (n = 226), whose TRAb course was called “fluctuating,” the rates of remission at the end of follow-up were significantly lower than in the group whose TRAb levels remained normal (37.2% vs. 88.9%, P<0.0001).

Overall, the time to remission for all groups combined was a median of 6.8 years (interquartile range, 4.0–10.9).

The cumulative fraction going into remission was 18.2% after 5 years, 38.3% after 10 years, 41.8% after 15 years, and 52.1% after 20 years.

Approximately 6% of patients became spontaneously hypothyroid over the >8-year follow up period.

However, there were factors during antithyroid drug therapy that were predictive of failure to remit, including time to normalization of TRAb and persistence of a palpable goiter.

Conclusions

In patients with Graves’ disease, remissions often occur after 4 to 11 years of antithyroid drug therapy.

Some patients have resolution of TRAb within 2 to 5 years, while in others, TRAb levels fluctuate or remain positive for extended periods (>5 years). In this cohort, the odds of remission could not be predicted by baseline clinical or laboratory variables.

In patients hoping to avoid ablative therapy, continuous antithyroid drug therapy for >5 years is reasonable ... in patients with well-controlled mild disease (2,3).

Commentary

The 2016 American Thyroid Association clinical practice guidelines for the management of hyperthyroidism state that after 12 to 18 months of antithyroid drug therapy: “Patients with persistently high TRAb could continue ATD therapy… or opt for alternate definitive therapy with RAI or surgery.

In selected patients (i.e., younger patients with mild stable disease on a low dose of MMI), long-term MMI is a reasonable alternative approach” (2).

The present article confirms data from other series of adult (5) and pediatric (11) patients that show that remissions in Graves’ disease patients continue to be achieved after many years (>5–10) of continuous antithyroid drug therapy. Therefore, in patients who wish to avoid permanent hypothyroidism or potential complications of ablative therapy, long-term antithyroid drug therapy is a viable option.

However, in older patients (e.g., those >60 years of age), definitive therapy should be more strongly considered at the time of initial diagnosis or if TRAb titers persist for more than 1 to 2 years of antithyroid drug therapy (3).

This is because the effects of persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism that could develop are potentially life-threatening (e.g., atrial fibrillation or other adverse cardiovascular outcome (12)) or clinically significant (e.g., osteoporosis).

While it is true that older patients are more likely to achieve remission (7), the worry that remissions are not necessarily lifelong makes definitive treatment more reasonable (3).

However, in young and middle-aged patients, long-term therapy with methimazole may become a more widely accepted strategy, especially given recent data on the adverse effects of radioiodine therapy on quality of life (13).

Failure to attain normal TRAb levels after 12 to 18 months of methimazole therapy does not rule out the possibility of remission occurring over a longer time horizon of 5 to 10 years. Even in patients with “smoldering” TRAb, about 20% became negative over prolonged follow-up.

(Please refer to the link for the full article)

Written by
ling profile image
ling
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
31 Replies
twinkiegal profile image
twinkiegal

Thanks so much, that is so interesting! I have had Graves on and off for for 13 years and am always having to tell my physicians that I don't want to kill off my thyroid. Now I have something I can physically bring in to show her. Thanks for posting!

ling profile image
ling in reply totwinkiegal

13 years!! Amazing : )

Are u on a low dose ATD?

Your Graves symptoms are well controlled?

Was your TRAb ever tested?

twinkiegal profile image
twinkiegal in reply toling

Yes, I've always had fairly mild symptoms...the usual, weight loss, fast heart rate, muscle weakness. But nothing that was absolutely dreadful. Right now I'm taking 5mg of methimazole (same thing as carbimazole, but here in the US) every other day. My TRAb was tested when I was first diagnosed and then one other time when I was euthyroid about 5 years ago. I have been on methimazole this last round for about 2 years.

ling profile image
ling in reply totwinkiegal

Thank you for sharing.

Over the 13 years, how many times have u been in remission and for how long?

twinkiegal profile image
twinkiegal in reply toling

After I was diagnosed the first time I went into remission for about 5 years. Then I had a relapse and now that I look back, probably was taken off ATDs too soon. That happened a couple times. This is the longest I've been on ATDs but they have always worked at controlling my levels and I really haven't ever felt horrible. My endo has agreed to try long term ATDs so hopefully this study will make her feel better.

ling profile image
ling in reply totwinkiegal

Yes, doctors usually adhere to the 18-24 month rule, and without testing TRAb, stop the carbimazole. And as we all know, if TRAb is still high, likely relapse will occur.

This study gives hope, in that staying on a low dose ATD long term, one can still go into remission after many years.

Best wishes.

twinkiegal profile image
twinkiegal in reply toling

Thanks! Now if I could just get her to stop dosing off my TSH levels, she always wants to give me more methimazole when I have a lower normal level. 🙄

ling profile image
ling in reply totwinkiegal

Wonder why in the UK, diagnosing and management by doctors, is so focused on TSH?

twinkiegal profile image
twinkiegal in reply toling

I don't know, but they do it in the US too where I am! For the longest time she wasn't testing my T3 either. Now she does after I kept pestering her. I hope she'll test my TRAb now as well.

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie

Thank you - very interesting article :

Just hope people who need to know, do really want to know and work to change the restrictive practise and treatments offered in this specialisation.

ling profile image
ling in reply topennyannie

Pity TRAb isn't more frequently tested.

I wonder if TRAb testing is very expensive?

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie in reply toling

I've no idea but it seems to me the current treatment for Graves Disease is cost related :

So sadly if it does come down to how much a blood test costs - last time I looked, about 4 years ago it was around a pound to process a T3 blood test.

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie

Healthylife21

Healthylife21 profile image
Healthylife21 in reply topennyannie

Thank you ! I've printed it out and going to bring to the hospital with me on Thursday.

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie in reply toHealthylife21

Excellent - talk about good timing !!!

Good luck and keep us in the loop:

ling profile image
ling in reply toHealthylife21

Please bear in mind that to have what is considered "well-controlled mild disease", you must be able to get your carbimazole down to a low dose. That would also mean your "disease activity" has stabilised.

Best wishes.

Healthylife21 profile image
Healthylife21 in reply toling

Yes, that’s why I want to ask to gradually reduce my meds . Thank you might need some luck if the new endo will try to push me to have RAI or surgery. Then, the printed article will be my weapon ))

ling profile image
ling in reply toHealthylife21

Don't totally not consider RAI or surgery. These are part of treatment protocol meant especially for difficult-to-control Graves.

Like you, I was against RAI and surgery in the first few years after diagnosis. As the disease course unfolded over the years, when some symptoms got really freaky, I have come to accept that RAI or surgery might be necessary should the need arise.

However, I totally understand that this is a very personal decision with many of us with Graves. If I had better doctors, the decision would have been easier.

In your case, at 40mg carbimazole daily for the last 4 years, if that high dose continues not to be reducible, it's something to think about.

So yes, trying to reduce it, is worth a try.

Best wishes.

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie in reply toling

I think if one needs to disable the thyroid the gland should be totally removed as it is a much cleaner and more precise solution.

Having been living with the consequences of RAI treatment which didn't occur until some years after drinking this toxic substance I found no help nor understanding in the medical mainstream.

It does seem this cheap, quick fix, does have long term consequences but in my case, I couldn't get any acknowledgement of same, and have managed my own ill health ever since.

Having had my situation and suspicions confirmed by Elaine Moore first in print, and then personally I simply feel if there is no accountability in the medical mainstream and if no one chooses to join up the dots, we will never have unbiased information on which to even have a discussion even if given any treatment options.

NIKEGIRL profile image
NIKEGIRL

Great article Ling. I hope this finds you well. Kindest regards always NIKEGIRL

ling profile image
ling in reply toNIKEGIRL

I hope you are feeling better as well : )

God bless you well : ) : )

NIKEGIRL profile image
NIKEGIRL in reply toling

Thanks. I hope you are in a better place. It’s just sooo bloody hard. Love to u always NIKEGIRL 😊

ling profile image
ling in reply toNIKEGIRL

Ya true ... been having some bad months : (

NIKEGIRL profile image
NIKEGIRL in reply toling

Yes I’m sorry it has been so hard. You can always PM me. I’ve been doing it tough as well. It’s just a crap deal really

ling profile image
ling in reply toNIKEGIRL

Thank you.

You're one tough lady : )

NIKEGIRL profile image
NIKEGIRL in reply toling

I would say the same to you. I’m not tough. I’m just not a quitter and that can be to my detriment.

ling profile image
ling in reply toNIKEGIRL

Yes, you're right.

That's also very much a quality of those with Graves

: (

Winterdrop profile image
Winterdrop

Thanks for this. (I have Graves). I shall make it one of the studies I refer to next time I am 'bullied' to go down the RAI route. Although, to be fair, my Endo did mention long term carbimazole treatment in our last conversation. I think she was fed up with me bringing up the Professor Toft article and can of worms over the NHS no longer routinely prescribing T3!Hopefully, times are slowly changing and people will be more routinely given the option of long term carbimazole treatment rather than steered towards RAI. Thank you.

ling profile image
ling in reply toWinterdrop

Certainly long term ATD can and does work well for those with "mild well controlled" disease.

Best wishes.

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie

lau99

pennyannie profile image
pennyannie

birkie

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Long term antithyroid medication

Another good recent article in support of longer term therapy for Graves. Not sure it’s been...
Coconutty profile image

Antithyroid Treatment as Effective as RAI for Graves Relapse and better for TED

Low-dose antithyroid drug therapy for Graves' disease relapse is as effective as radioiodine (RAI)...
Clutter profile image

Indefinite antithyroid drug therapy in toxic Graves’ disease: What are the cons

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830376/ Whilst I don't agree especially with the cost...
ling profile image

Is Long-Term Antithyroid Use the Best Treatment for Graves Disease?

This is a three-way chat among endos about long-term treatment of Graves using methimazole...
helvella profile image
Administrator

Long-Term Antithyroid Drug Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We have read of too many Graves sufferers being pushed towards either radioactive iodine treatment...
helvella profile image
Administrator