This "updated exploratory analysis" (aacrjournals.org/clincancer... indicates: "superior overall survival (OS) outcomes with palbociclib plus fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant alone in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who had progressed on prior endocrine therapy. The favorable OS associated with palbociclib was observed across most subgroups, regardless of ESR1, PIK3CA, or TP53 mutation status."
Overall Survival With Palbociclib and... - SHARE Metastatic ...
Overall Survival With Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer
Wonderful! Just when I am progressing. Good bye, Ibrance.
This is very nice, in the sense that I'd progressed and was then on Ibrance and Faslodex for about 4.5 years, but now the new stuff (generic of Avastin) gave me a blood pressure of 150/94 and higher. Me, who was always dizzy from low blood pressure. Yeeks.
Thank you so much for sharing this article. Although not data was provided, the analysis is quite comprehensive. Not only the patients were followed up for 6 years, impact on mutations on OS and PFS was investigated.
I encourage you to t
Read the entire article, not just an abstract.
Which lead me to a question. How many of you had liquid biopsy? I didn’t, although biopsy results included mutations.
It would be great periodically have a liguid biopsy to determine that ER and HERG status remains the same and there are no change in the mutations.
All the best to you!
So I read most of it, as you recommended. Eighty percent of those in the treatment group (palbo + fulvestrant) were dead after six years? I started Ibrance +fulvestrant in 2019, so I have 3 years? That may be about right. I went on to other treatments in 2021. Doesn't factor in the success of these subsequent meds, though. It was a Stage 3 trial. The people in the control group (fulvestrant + placebo) died faster. Wouldn't have liked to be randomly assigned to control.
I guess I am putting a negative spin on "good news."
Oh, and I have had one liquid biopsy. I had to ask for it. It showed no mutations, good to know. I guess I will wait until next progression before asking for another.
As you know, it’s all individual and the science still figuring out what factors are leading to better outcome. This is why I found interesting the analysis in the subgroups like various mutations. Also, it seems that patients who didn’t received prior chemo doing better
Again, the results are preliminary and I’d not focus specifically on the survival data.
We need to hang out long enouph for another line of therapy to come along 😊.
thanks for posting !