Transperineal biopsy vs. transrectal ... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,941 members3,076 posts

Transperineal biopsy vs. transrectal biopsy

Hope4Happiness profile image
21 Replies

I have Gleason 6 prostate cancer (2 cores - 1% and 3% - of 14) and have been on AS since 2017. A recent MRI revealed a PIRADS-3 lesion, and the doctor at MSKCC would like to move ahead with a transperineal biopsy targeting a specific region.

Up to this point, I have only had transrectal biopsies.

If anyone has some experience with transperineal biopsies and could share some perspective, that would be greatly appreciated.... especially comparisons between the two.

I know this type of biopsy requires anesthesia.

Thanks very much in advance for any replies!

Written by
Hope4Happiness profile image
Hope4Happiness
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
21 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

They can do a nerve block instead of general anesthesia. The top centers are all moving to transperineal because of the lower risk of infection.

cesces profile image
cesces in reply to Tall_Allen

Interesting. Infection was a long time known risk.

Why only now are they switching to transperineal do you think?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to cesces

Sepsis rates increasing.

cesces profile image
cesces in reply to Tall_Allen

That's even more intriguing... as to what would cause an increase in sepsis rates over a 10 to 20 year period of time.

I guess they are making more punctures by taking more samples now.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply to cesces

Greater sepsis--some of it related no doubt to antibiotic resistance. They usually seem to be using fluoroquinolones, which have their own set of potential problems (though the use in biopsy is short-term).

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to cesces

Resistant e. coli mostly

cesanon profile image
cesanon in reply to Tall_Allen

hmmm... not a good sign that this has changed so much in the last 10 to 20 years.

EdinBmore profile image
EdinBmore in reply to Tall_Allen

Allen,

Probably a stupid question but here it is: what is the transperineal procedure? Similar to brachy procedure?

Thanks,

EdinBaltimore

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to EdinBmore

Instead of inserting needles through the rectum to pull out tissue from the prostate, they insert the needles through the perineum area (the taint).

Aussieguy1 profile image
Aussieguy1

My biopsy was a targeted trans perineal biopsy done under general anaesthesia. In my case no problems at all post biopsy, other then obvious blood in my ejaculate, which cleared pretty quickly. No pain as such, slight discomfort at the perineal site. No antibiotic coverage required. Day off work on the day of the procedure and the next day. Needed to fast from midnight, early morning procedure, home post recovery ward. I’m in Australia so covered by our public health system, no out of pocket expenses. Gleason 6. PIRADS 4. 80% in two cores, 5% in one other. Active Surveillance.

Hope it all goes well for you.

mike__c profile image
mike__c

I had a transperineal biopsy without general anesthesia and only local. It wasn't particularly painful on the table, though had I been given the option of a general, i might have taken it because the ultrasound wand in the rectum for 20 minutes is not that much fun. There was blood in the urine for about 36-48 hours. Some mild pain afterwards but it cleared up after a a few days. I would take the following day off of work, but I probably could have worked the following day if absolutely necessary.

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling

I've had 2 Saturation Transperineal 3Dimension Prostate MAPPING Biopsies, first yielding 100+ core samples and 2nd only needing 64 core samples. Done under General, using a Brachy Grid for needle insertion with Ultrasound. Performed by Dr. Gary Onik

mayoclinic.org/medical-prof...

koelis.com/transperineal-bi...

Currumpaw profile image
Currumpaw in reply to addicted2cycling

Hey addicted2cycling!

Dr. Onik is in many ways ahead of other doctors. The fact is, some areas of the prostate aren't accessible or are difficult to biopsy unless a transperineal biopsy is used.

Currumpaw

Hope4Happiness profile image
Hope4Happiness

Thanks very much for all the replies and info!

Currumpaw profile image
Currumpaw

Hey Hope4Happiness!

If a drug is used as a prophylactic to prevent sepsis insist on Cefdinir or Rocephin rather than any of the fluoroquinolone drugs such as Cipro and Levaquin. Fluoroquinolones can cause nightmare adverse reactions including aortic aneurysms. As T_A noted, the risk of infection is greatly reduced. A betadine cleansing on the outside maybe.

The transperineal biopsy can also reach areas of the prostate that are difficult to biopsy or can't be biopsied with the transrectal. That is another important reason the top docs are switching to transperineal biopsies.

A link:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Transrectal or transperineal biopsy: which is best ...

santishealth.org/.../transr...

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

An excerpt:

"In addition, perhaps the biggest downside of the transrectal approach is that it is harder/impossible to reach the part of the prostate (the anterior, or frontal aspect) that is furthest away from the biopsy needle. This leads to poor ‘sampling’ – in that the tissue samples collected by the needles may miss any cancer found in this part of the prostate, leading to an inaccurate biopsy. Playing devil’s advocate, you could imagine that in a worst-case scenario cancer is present in the anterior portion while no cancer is present in the other parts of the prostate. A transrectal approach might miss the cancer in the anterior, with the biopsy coming back clear from the other parts of the prostate. In essence, all parts of the prostate need to be sampled completely for the most accurate biopsy result."

Currumpaw

Hiker64 profile image
Hiker64

I've had both types of biopsies. The transrectal was painful and left me with ongoing pain for about 6 months. Took only about an hour though from the time I walked in the door till I walked out. The transperineal one was under general anesthesia and I was there a total of about 5 hours. No pain, no infection, found a lesion that was Gleason 7 closer to the middle of my prostate that a transrectal biopsy would have likely missed, and my urologist was able to do a cystoscopy at the same time which aren't too pleasurable if you are awake. I figure you can guess which was my favorite way to biopsy! I wish you the best.

jazzy53 profile image
jazzy53

I received a transperineal biopsy and was denied anesthesia except for a local that had little or no effect. I would highly recommend that you insist on anesthesia, whether a nerve block, deep sedation, or nerve block. It hurt like hell without any significant pain control. Yeah, it's over in 15 minutes and you just move on from there, but there's no reason to endure the pain.

Hope4Happiness profile image
Hope4Happiness

Very much appreciate all the replies! I've scheduled my transperineal biopsy for June. I receive my second COVID vax in mid-May, so I'll be good to go.

Hope4Happiness profile image
Hope4Happiness

Just circling back around here -- I had my transperineal biopsy yesterday at MSKCC. This was my eighth biospy but my first that was not transrectal.

I must say that the prep and steps leading up to biopsy were a lot longer, and it could be a bit more intimidating because you do feel you are preparing for an operation/full procedure because of the time spent waiting at an actual hospital, getting prepped, meeting with the anesthesiologist, being wheeled into a full-scale operating room, etc. With my previous transrectal biopsies, you just sort of jump on the table, lie sideways, get hit with the lidocaine, they insert the gizmo, and the doc starts rolling...

That said, the "after procedure" has been a totally different experience. After I woke up after the procedure, you could have convinced me that nothing was done. I didn't feel a thing and a day later, I'd never know I had a procedure pain-wise... After the transrectal biopsies, it always felt like the doc just turned me over and kicked me in the ace 10 times! There was always some soreness.

Anyway, I'm hoping this biopsy and the .9cm PIRADS 3 lesion it was investigating turns out to be Gleason 6, BPH, or less so I can continue on AS.

Greeneyecolor profile image
Greeneyecolor in reply to Hope4Happiness

I'm set to have the same procedure done at MSK in a few weeks. First time for me and feeling very anxious as to what lies ahead. Also quite concerned about general anesthesia, as I was also recently diagnosed with sleep apnea. This whole experience came out of nowhere and I'm really finding it hard to manage it all emotionally/psychologically.

Mel8425 profile image
Mel8425

I have had both methods.The transferral put me in the hospital for 11 days with sepsis, I would never do that again.

The trans perineal was easier as they put me to sleep and I had no side effects.

You may also like...

Liquid biopsy vs. Transperineal

Is liquid biopsy ever used as an alternative to transperineal biopsy for diagnosis and guide to...

Can any Urologist do a transperineal biopsy?

My Urologist normally does transrectal but he has done a few transperineal (TP). I told him I may...

MRI-guided transperineal biopsy hurt so much

unbearable pain from the biopsy. I almost passed out and the thought of my next biopsy gives me...

General Anesthesia for Biopsy

get a prostate biopsy (more on my situation in this thread https://healthunlocked.com/prostate-cance

Forgoing Regular Prostate Biopsies

I am electing to forgo the biopsy unless the MRI shows changes that would warrant further invasive...