Liquid biopsy vs. Transperineal - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,079 members3,181 posts

Liquid biopsy vs. Transperineal

Longrunner profile image
9 Replies

Is liquid biopsy ever used as an alternative to transperineal biopsy for diagnosis and guide to follow up treatment?

I don’t want to go down a research ‘rabbit hole’ if there is current scientific consensus on its diagnostic value and treatment guidance for Prostate cancer

I already have more than enough to ask my urology oncologist before I schedule my necessary biopsy! Thanks in advance for everyone’s knowledge and experience

Written by
Longrunner profile image
Longrunner
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
9 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Do you mean the Sentinel Prostate Test done on urine? Let us know if you can get it and what it costs.

mirscientific.com/

I haven't heard from any patients who have used it instead of a biopsy.

maley2711 profile image
maley2711 in reply to Tall_Allen

MIR does not make any claim that their 4 risk categories are any more predictive of future metastasis than are the Gleason scores, correct?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to maley2711

The NCCN risk categories predict for recurrence. Sentinel correctly identifies the risk categories.

Longrunner profile image
Longrunner in reply to Tall_Allen

🤔 Is it the case that Sentinel identifies risk categories with greater specificity and accuracy than a transperineal biopsy or is a diagnostic tool used in addition to a biopsy.?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to Longrunner

The risk categories are defined by biopsy, so it can't be better than the definition.

Longrunner profile image
Longrunner in reply to Tall_Allen

Thank you very much. I am going in the wrong direction. Your referral in another post to the NCCN Guidelines is very much appreciated. I have been fumbling around to determine and understand the next step in my diagnosis.

davenj profile image
davenj

Based on this 2018 article, more testing is still required.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

Currumpaw profile image
Currumpaw in reply to davenj

Nice davenj,

You posted what needed to be read!

I believe I came close to having this very test just before it was shut down. I knew the test was on borrowed time and if there were questions about it's accuracy I was not going to spend hundreds for suspect results.

If this type of testing can be refined it would certainly be more accurate than the biopsy needle.

The most accurate test today for prostate cancer is a pathology report on a removed prostate.

Currumpaw

Longrunner profile image
Longrunner in reply to Currumpaw

Agreed. It’s dropped from my radar. Thanks.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Prostate Cancer PSA is detectible again

I am a 57-year-old male. My prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2019, and I had a radical...

PSA continues rise...PSMA remains good

To briefly review, now 69 years old, had RP at Hopkins in Feb 2018. Gleason 4+5. Margins clear....

After Orgovyx

Age 76, diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer in December 2021. PSA was 8.6, but had zero...

Typical PSA Level Decay Post-SBRT?

Greetings Group! I'm wondering if anyone has come across some charts or tables showing expected...

My prostate journey and testosterone side effects

I have been following this website for over a year now and have learned so much from others who...