Thank you everyone who has helped so far.
Last night I had a message from Rheumy saying I should go to the hospital for an emergency biopsy, with the headache and unusual severe temporal pain being the driver. He said that U/S was so ‘operator sensitive’ as to be unreliable in this ‘locality’.
The (island of Gozo) hospital is fine, but I didn’t think I would get prompt treatment on a Saturday night, and going by the two paragraphs from an academic paper, quoted below, could be a nail in the coffin.
I am mulling whether to turn up at the hospital today (Sunday), just with his email, and ask for a biopsy, or wait till my Dr and/or Rheumatologist sends a note/appointment for here or elsewhere, or other answer.
In any case, and I am not sure if you agree, I increased my dose last night to 60 mgs because ‘visual loss occurs prior to glucocorticoid treatment or shortly after treatment initiation’ ? (No unusual reaction observed to the increase from 4mgs).
‘Visual loss or stroke may occur in GCA, attributed to vascular occlusion; most GCA-associated visual loss occurs prior to glucocorticoid treatment or shortly after treatment initiation, underlining the importance of immediate treatment if the disease is strongly suspected’.
‘ If rapid-access vascular ultrasound is not available, patients treated for suspected GCA should all have a temporal artery biopsy. None of these tests should delay the prescribing of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy for patients with strongly suspected GCA’.
This does not invalidate the usefulness of U/S. On the paper below, there is a diagnostic path where U/S in integral in the pathway to diagnosis and treatment.
I am hoping for a negative and I can return to my lowest level of dose to suppress symptoms, as we all agree is our goal.
As ever I am very grateful both for your depth of knowledge and kindness.
Source: academic.oup.com/rheumatolo...